Goldsmiths College, London, UK.
School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, UK.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct;60(4):1136-1153. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12458. Epub 2021 May 12.
The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has been called the 'civil rights issue of our time' (Holt & Sweitzer, 2020, Self and Identity, 19(, p. 16) but the All Lives Matter (ALM) movement swiftly emerged as an oppositional response to BLM. Prior research has investigated some predictors of support for ALM over BLM, but these predictors have thus far not included levels of racial bias or potentially relevant constructions of racism. This pre-registered, cross-sectional study (N = 287) tested the degree to which White participants' support for ALM could be predicted using measures of racism (implicit and explicit) and ideological stances around the construction of 'racism' (that discourage the recognition of contemporary inequalities and discrimination). Using multiple regression analyses, we found that implicit racism, colour-blind ideology, and narrow definitional boundaries of discrimination positively predicted support for ALM over BLM. Explicit racism, collective narcissism, and right-wing political orientation did not predict ALM support, nor did any (2-way) interaction of these predictors. Implications for our understanding of the All Lives Matter movement are discussed.
“黑人的命也是命”（BLM）运动被称为“我们时代的民权问题”（Holt & Sweitzer，2020，自我认同，19(，第 16 页），但“所有人的命都是命”（ALM）运动迅速作为对 BLM 的反对回应出现。先前的研究已经调查了支持 ALM 而非 BLM 的一些预测因素，但这些预测因素迄今为止并未包括种族偏见水平或潜在相关的种族主义结构。这项预先注册的横断面研究（N=287）测试了使用种族主义（内隐和外显）和有关“种族主义”构建的意识形态立场（阻止对当代不平等和歧视的认识）的措施来预测白人参与者对 ALM 的支持程度。使用多元回归分析，我们发现内隐种族主义、色盲意识形态和歧视的狭义定义界限积极预测了对 ALM 的支持高于对 BLM 的支持。外显种族主义、集体自恋和右翼政治倾向不能预测对 ALM 的支持，这些预测因素之间也没有任何（2 向）相互作用。讨论了对我们理解“所有人的命都是命”运动的影响。
