Associate Academic, UDoL, University of Derby, Kedleston Road, Derby, DE22 1GB, UK.
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Sep;24(3):433-442. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10019-2. Epub 2021 May 12.
In recent years there have been several calls in professional and academic journals for healthcare personnel in Canada to raise the profile of postcolonial theory as a theoretical and explanatory framework for their practice with Indigenous people. In this paper I explore some of the challenges that are likely to confront those healthcare personnel in engaging with postcolonial theory in a training context. I consider these challenges in relation to three areas of conflict. First I consider conflicts around paradigms of knowledge, wherein postcolonial theory operates from a different base from most professional knowledge in health care. Second I consider conflicts of ideology, wherein postcolonial theory is largely at odds with Canada's political and popular cultures. And finally I consider issues around the question of Canada's legitimacy, which postcolonial theory puts in doubt. I suggest ways in which these conflicts might be addressed and managed in the training context, and also identify potential positive outcomes that would be enabling for healthcare personnel, and might also contribute to an improvement in Canada's relationship with its indigenous peoples.
近年来,专业和学术期刊上多次呼吁加拿大医疗保健人员提高后殖民理论的地位,将其作为与原住民实践的理论和解释框架。在本文中,我探讨了在培训背景下,医疗保健人员在接触后殖民理论时可能面临的一些挑战。我考虑了这三个冲突领域中的挑战。首先,我考虑了知识范式方面的冲突,在后殖民理论中,知识的基础与大多数医疗保健专业知识不同。其次,我考虑了意识形态方面的冲突,在后殖民理论中,与加拿大的政治和流行文化格格不入。最后,我考虑了关于加拿大合法性的问题,后殖民理论对此提出了质疑。我提出了在培训背景下解决和管理这些冲突的方法,同时还确定了对医疗保健人员有帮助的潜在积极结果,这也可能有助于改善加拿大与土著人民的关系。