• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Improving depression severity assessment--I. Reliability, internal validity and sensitivity to change of three observer depression scales.

作者信息

Maier W, Philipp M, Heuser I, Schlegel S, Buller R, Wetzel H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Mainz, F.R.G.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 1988;22(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(88)90022-2.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3956(88)90022-2
PMID:3397908
Abstract

The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) is the most commonly used scale for depression severity assessment and for antidepressant treatment evaluation. Alternative scales have been proposed by Bech and Rafaelsen (BRMS) and by Montgomery and Asberg (MADRS) to try to overcome the shortcomings of HAMD: they are based on different concepts of severity and different scaling procedures. Comparisons with respect to reliability, validity and ability to detect change have been performed using these scales in different samples. The BRMS proved superior. This result makes it necessary to question the usual procedure of testing the efficacy of antidepressants by means of HAMD alone. Problems in defining the severity of depression and in testing the validity of severity scales are discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Improving depression severity assessment--I. Reliability, internal validity and sensitivity to change of three observer depression scales.
J Psychiatr Res. 1988;22(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(88)90022-2.
2
Improving depression severity assessment--II. Content, concurrent and external validity of three observer depression scales.
J Psychiatr Res. 1988;22(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(88)90023-4.
3
Comparative analysis of observer depression scales.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1985 Sep;72(3):239-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb02601.x.
4
[Studies of the reliability and validity of the German version of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)].
Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr (1985). 1988;139(2):51-65.
5
The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders.汉密尔顿焦虑量表:焦虑症和抑郁症的信度、效度及对变化的敏感性
J Affect Disord. 1988 Jan-Feb;14(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(88)90072-9.
6
On the validity of the Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale (BRMS).关于贝克-拉范森躁狂量表(BRMS)的效度。
J Affect Disord. 1999 Jul;54(1-2):119-28. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00150-5.
7
Using longitudinal data from a clinical trial in depression to assess the reliability of its outcome scales.利用抑郁症临床试验的纵向数据评估其结果量表的可靠性。
J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Apr;43(7):730-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
8
The Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale and the Hamilton Depression Scale.贝克-拉法尔森躁狂量表和汉密尔顿抑郁量表。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1979 Apr;59(4):420-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1979.tb04484.x.
9
The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale: reliability and validity.蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表:信度与效度
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1986 May;73(5):544-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb02723.x.
10
Getting what you ask for: on the selectivity of depression rating scales.得偿所愿:论抑郁评定量表的选择性
Psychother Psychosom. 2003 Mar-Apr;72(2):61-70. doi: 10.1159/000068690.

引用本文的文献

1
The cerebral and cognitive changes after intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) treatment for depression: study protocol for a randomized double-blind sham-controlled trial.经颅磁刺激(TMS)治疗抑郁症后脑和认知变化:一项随机双盲假刺激对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Nov 11;25(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08606-8.
2
A qualitative investigation of the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale: discrepancies in rater perceptions and data trends in remote assessments of rapid-acting antidepressants in treatment resistant depression.蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁评定量表的定性研究:难治性抑郁症中快速起效抗抑郁药远程评估中评估者认知与数据趋势的差异
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 1;15:1289630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1289630. eCollection 2024.
3
Study protocol: exercise training for treating major depressive disorder in multiple sclerosis.研究方案:运动训练治疗多发性硬化症中的重度抑郁症。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Apr 17;24(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03634-y.
4
Gender differences in the association between anxiety symptoms and thyroid hormones in young patients with first-episode and drug naïve major depressive disorder.首发且未用药的年轻重度抑郁症患者中焦虑症状与甲状腺激素之间关联的性别差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 29;14:1218551. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1218551. eCollection 2023.
5
Machine Learning-Based Definition of Symptom Clusters and Selection of Antidepressants for Depressive Syndrome.基于机器学习的抑郁综合征症状群定义及抗抑郁药物选择
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 7;11(9):1631. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091631.
6
Bouldering psychotherapy is effective in enhancing perceived self-efficacy in people with depression: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial.抱石心理疗法在增强抑郁症患者的自我效能感方面是有效的:一项多中心随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Aug 26;9(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00627-1.
7
Combining machine learning algorithms for prediction of antidepressant treatment response.结合机器学习算法预测抗抑郁治疗反应。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Jan;143(1):36-49. doi: 10.1111/acps.13250. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
8
Predictive modeling of treatment resistant depression using data from STAR*D and an independent clinical study.使用来自 STAR*D 和一项独立临床研究的数据对治疗抵抗性抑郁症进行预测建模。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):e0197268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197268. eCollection 2018.
9
Education did not interact with major depression on performance of memory tests in acute southern Brazilian in patients.在巴西南部急性病患者中,教育程度与重度抑郁症对记忆测试表现并无交互作用。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2007 Jan-Mar;1(1):24-31. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642008DN10100005.
10
Understanding the Outcomes Measures used in Huntington Disease Pharmacological Trials: A Systematic Review.了解亨廷顿病药物试验中使用的疗效指标:一项系统综述。
J Huntingtons Dis. 2014;3(3):233-52. doi: 10.3233/JHD-140115.