Institute for Advanced Studies, IUSS, Pavia, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Casimiro Mondino, Pavia, Italy.
Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Aug;127:474-491. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 9.
The neuroscientific study of conceptual representation has largely focused on categories of concrete entities (biological entities, tools…), while abstract knowledge has been less extensively investigated. The possible presence of a categorical organization of abstract knowledge is a debated issue. An embodied cognition framework predicts an organization of the abstract domain into different dimensions, grounded in the brain regions engaged by the corresponding experience. Here we review the types of experience that have been proposed to characterize different categories of abstract concepts, and the evidence supporting a corresponding organization derived from behavioural, neuroimaging (i.e., fMRI, MRI, PET, SPECT), EEG, and neurostimulation (i.e., TMS) studies in healthy and clinical populations. The available data provide substantial converging evidence in favour of the presence of distinct neural representations of social and emotional knowledge, mental states and magnitude concepts, engaging brain systems involved in the corresponding experiences. This evidence is supporting an extension of embodied models of semantic memory organization to several types of abstract knowledge.
概念表示的神经科学研究主要集中在具体实体的类别上(生物实体、工具等),而抽象知识的研究则相对较少。抽象知识是否存在分类组织是一个有争议的问题。具身认知框架预测抽象领域的组织分为不同的维度,其基础是与相应经验相关的大脑区域。在这里,我们回顾了用于描述不同类别抽象概念的经验类型,以及支持来自健康和临床人群的行为、神经影像学(即 fMRI、MRI、PET、SPECT)、脑电图和神经刺激(即 TMS)研究的相应组织的证据。现有数据提供了大量支持社交和情感知识、心理状态和数量概念的独特神经表示存在的证据,这些知识涉及到相应经验所涉及的大脑系统。这一证据支持将语义记忆组织的具身模型扩展到多种类型的抽象知识。