Espey Linda, Bechtold Laura, Ghio Marta
Institute of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 12;15(1):32468. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18415-x.
While there is accumulating evidence that emotional words are processed faster than neutral words, findings regarding processing differences between emotion-label and emotion-laden words are inconsistent, potentially due to uncontrolled word- or participant-specific characteristics. We therefore analyzed lexical decision reaction times for emotion-label, emotion-laden, and neutral abstract words, while controlling for subjective differences in word valence, arousal, concreteness, and interoception, as well as considering inter-individual differences in empathy. We neither replicated the facilitatory emotionality effect for emotion-label or emotion-laden compared to neutral word processing nor found evidence for a reaction time difference between emotion-label and -laden words. Notably, however, results showed a word type-specific effect of empathy: Participants reacted faster to specifically emotion-label words, the higher their empathy. Additional exploratory analyses confirmed a word-type-specific gradual pattern, with stronger association of emotion-label than emotion-laden than neutral words with absolute valence, arousal and interoception. These analyses yet again revealed a word-type-specific modulation by empathy, wherein emotion-label words' ratings were significantly enhanced by empathy. Individual differences in empathy thus seem to affect specifically the processing of emotion-label words and the evaluation of their affective properties. Our findings underline the importance to consider word- and participant-specific characteristics in research on the semantic processing of emotional abstract words.
虽然越来越多的证据表明,情感词汇的处理速度比中性词汇更快,但关于情感标签词和充满情感的词汇之间处理差异的研究结果并不一致,这可能是由于未控制的词汇或参与者特定特征所致。因此,我们分析了情感标签词、充满情感的词汇和中性抽象词的词汇判定反应时间,同时控制了词汇效价、唤醒度、具体性和内感受的主观差异,并考虑了同理心的个体差异。与中性词处理相比,我们既没有复制情感标签词或充满情感的词汇的促进性情感效应,也没有发现情感标签词和充满情感的词汇之间存在反应时间差异的证据。然而,值得注意的是,结果显示了同理心对特定词类型的影响:参与者对特定情感标签词的反应越快,他们的同理心越高。额外的探索性分析证实了一种特定词类型的渐进模式,即情感标签词比充满情感的词汇与中性词汇在绝对效价、唤醒度和内感受方面的关联更强。这些分析再次揭示了同理心对特定词类型的调节作用,其中同理心显著提高了情感标签词的评分。因此,同理心的个体差异似乎特别影响情感标签词的处理及其情感属性的评估。我们的研究结果强调了在情感抽象词语义处理研究中考虑词汇和参与者特定特征的重要性。