Department of Public Health and Primary Care, THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 12;21(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03261-8.
The Covid-19 pandemic has imposed extraordinary strains on healthcare workers. But, in contrast with acute settings, relatively little attention has been given to those who work in mental health settings. We aimed to characterise the experiences of those working in English NHS secondary mental health services during the first wave of the pandemic.
The design was a qualitative interview-based study. We conducted semi-structured, remote (telephone or online) interviews with 35 members of staff from NHS secondary (inpatient and community) mental health services in England. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method.
Participants reported wide-ranging changes in the organisation of secondary mental health care and the nature of work in response to the pandemic, including pausing of all services deemed to be "non-essential", deployment of staff across services to new and unfamiliar roles, and moves to remote working. The quality of participants' working life was impaired by increasing levels of daily challenge associated with trying to provide care in trying and constrained circumstances, the problems of forging new ways of working remotely, and constraints on ability to access informal support. Participants were confronted with difficult dilemmas relating to clinical decision-making, prioritisation of care, and compromises in ability to perform the therapeutic function of their roles. Other dilemmas centred on trying to balance the risks of controlling infection with the need for human contact. Many reported features of moral injury linked to their perceived failures in providing the quality or level of care that they felt service users needed. They sometimes sought to compensate for deficits in care through increased advocacy, taking on additional tasks, or making exceptions, but this led to further personal strain. Many experienced feelings of grief, helplessness, isolation, distress, and burnout. These problems were compounded by sometimes poor communication about service changes and by staff feeling that they could not take time off because of the potential impact on others. Some reported feeling poorly supported by organisations.
Mental health workers faced multiple adversities during the pandemic that were highly consequential for their wellbeing. These findings can help in identifying targets for support.
新冠疫情给医护人员带来了巨大压力。然而,与急症环境相比,精神健康环境中的医护人员所面临的问题却没有得到足够的关注。本研究旨在描述英国国民保健署(NHS)二级精神卫生服务机构工作人员在疫情第一波期间的经历。
这是一项基于定性访谈的研究。我们对英格兰 NHS 二级(住院和社区)精神卫生服务机构的 35 名工作人员进行了半结构式远程(电话或在线)访谈。分析基于恒比定样法。
参与者报告称,为应对疫情,二级精神卫生保健的组织和工作性质发生了广泛变化,包括暂停所有被认为“非必要”的服务,跨服务部署员工到新的和不熟悉的角色,以及转向远程工作。参与者的工作生活质量因以下因素而受损:日常挑战水平不断提高,即在困难和受限的情况下努力提供护理;远程工作新模式的建立存在问题;以及获得非正式支持的能力受限。参与者面临与临床决策、护理优先级和履行角色治疗功能的能力妥协相关的困难困境。其他困境集中在平衡控制感染风险与人类接触需求之间的关系。许多人报告了与未能提供他们认为服务使用者所需的护理质量或水平有关的道德伤害特征。他们有时通过增加倡导、承担额外任务或破例来弥补护理不足,但这导致了进一步的个人压力。许多人感到悲伤、无助、孤立、痛苦和精疲力竭。服务变更沟通不畅,以及工作人员因担心对他人产生影响而无法休假,使这些问题更加复杂。一些人报告说,他们感到组织的支持不足。
精神卫生工作者在疫情期间面临着多种逆境,这对他们的幸福感产生了重大影响。这些发现有助于确定支持的目标。