Suppr超能文献

一种有根据的猜测——外科医生的距离估计

An educated guess - Distance estimation by surgeons.

作者信息

Conway R Gregory, O'Neill Natalie, Brown Jessica, Kavic Stephen

机构信息

University of Maryland, Department of Surgery, Baltimore, MD, USA.

University of Maryland, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Surg Open Sci. 2020 Apr 30;2(3):113-116. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2020.04.001. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Estimating distance is a common task in surgery, yet development of distance estimation ability receives little attention in surgical training. Although the Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH) trial reinforced the importance of suture spacing by demonstrating reduced incisional hernia incidence in placement of 5-mm fascial sutures over 1 cm, we hypothesize that neither trainee nor attending surgeons possess the ability to estimate these distances with accuracy.

METHODS

We distributed a 4-question distance estimation exercise and a 6-question survey to resident and attending surgeons at a single academic medical center. The mean and the absolute error were compared using a test.

RESULTS

Most participants were trainees (44 vs 16 attendings, N = 60), and 27% used the metric system prior to undergraduate studies. The mean absolute errors for 5-mm and 1-cm mark placement were 1.40 and 2.07 mm, respectively. The 5-mm mark placement estimates ranged from 2.01 to 11.69 mm, and the 1-cm estimates ranged from 4.82 to 19.19 mm. There was no statistically significant difference in the estimates or absolute errors between trainees and attendings (5 mm P = .202; 1 cm P = .302).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that estimation of distance is a challenge, and development of this fundamental skill during surgical training may have important clinical consequences.

摘要

引言

估计距离是外科手术中的一项常见任务,然而在外科培训中,距离估计能力的培养却很少受到关注。尽管“腹部中线切口缝合的小针距与大针距比较(STITCH)”试验通过证明5毫米筋膜缝线间距为1厘米时切口疝发生率降低,强化了缝线间距的重要性,但我们推测实习医生和主治医生都无法准确估计这些距离。

方法

我们向一家学术医疗中心的住院医生和主治医生发放了一份包含4个问题的距离估计练习和一份包含6个问题的调查问卷。使用t检验比较均值和绝对误差。

结果

大多数参与者是实习医生(44名实习医生对16名主治医生,N = 60),27%的人在本科学习之前使用公制系统。5毫米和1厘米标记放置的平均绝对误差分别为1.40毫米和2.07毫米。5毫米标记放置估计范围为2.01至11.69毫米,1厘米估计范围为4.82至19.19毫米。实习医生和主治医生之间的估计值或绝对误差没有统计学上的显著差异(5毫米,P = 0.202;1厘米,P = 0.302)。

结论

这些发现表明距离估计是一项挑战,在外科培训期间培养这项基本技能可能会产生重要的临床影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4074/8083008/e64e173030d6/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验