Psychology Department, Syracuse University.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2021;91(2):271-279. doi: 10.1037/ort0000527.
In the United States, citizens opposed to stricter gun control laws as a response to mass shootings frequently reframe the problem of gun violence as a mental health issue. As a result, it has been suggested that pro-gun attitudes (i.e., pro-gun rights attitudes and favorable attitudes toward the National Rifle Association) might be associated with stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental illness. In three studies (total N = 756), we assessed gun attitudes as predictors of mental illness stigma among college students in the United States (data collected in 2018 and 2019). While zero-order correlations revealed that pro-gun attitudes predict more negative attitudes toward people with mental illness, they were not unique predictors after adjusting for political affiliation. These findings replicate previous research on the relationship between conservatism and mental illness stigma and provide a starting point for future research assessing relationships between gun attitudes, political affiliation, and mental illness stigma. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
在美国,一些公民反对针对大规模枪击事件而制定更严格的枪支管制法,他们经常将枪支暴力问题重新定义为一个心理健康问题。因此,有人认为,支持枪支的态度(即支持枪支权利的态度和对全国步枪协会的有利态度)可能与对精神病患者的污名化态度有关。在三项研究中(共 756 人),我们评估了枪支态度作为美国大学生心理健康污名的预测指标(数据于 2018 年和 2019 年收集)。虽然零阶相关性表明,支持枪支的态度预示着对精神病患者的态度更负面,但在调整政治派别后,它们并不是唯一的预测因素。这些发现复制了之前关于保守主义与心理健康污名之间关系的研究,并为未来评估枪支态度、政治派别和心理健康污名之间关系的研究提供了一个起点。