Das Darpan, Ramachandran Gurumurthy
Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Environ Res. 2021 Aug;199:111268. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111268. Epub 2021 May 11.
Due to the airborne nature of viral particles, adequate ventilation has been identified as one suitable mitigation strategy for reducing their transmission. While 'dilution of air by opening the window' has been prescribed by national and international health agencies, unintended detrimental consequences might result in many developing countries with high ambient air pollution. In the present study, PM exposure concentration and probability of mortality due to PM in different scenarios were assessed. A COVID airborne infection risk estimator was used to estimate the probability of infection by aerosol transmission in various commuter micro-environments: (a) air conditioned (AC) taxi (b) non-AC taxi (c) bus and (d) autorickshaw. The following were the estimated exposure concentrations in the four types of vehicles during pre-lockdown, during lockdown, and lost-lockdown: AC taxi cars (17.16 μg/m, 4.52 μg/m, and 25.09 μg/m); non-AC taxis: (28.74 μg/m, 7.56 μg/m, 42.01 μg/m); buses (21.79 μg/m, 5.73 μg/m, 31.86 μg/m) autorickshaws (51.30 μg/m, 3.50 μg/m, 75 μg/m). Post-lockdown, the probability of mortality due to PM was highest for autorickshaws (5.67 × 10), followed by non-AC taxis (2.07 × 10), buses (1.39 × 10), and AC taxis (1.02 × 10). This order of risk is inverted for the probability of infection by SARS-COV-2, with the highest for AC taxis (6.10 × 10), followed by non-AC taxis (1.71 × 10), buses (1.42 × 10), and the lowest risk in autorickshaws (1.99 × 10). The findings of the present study suggest that vehicles with higher ventilation or air changes per hour (ACH) should be preferred over other modes of transport during COVID-19 pandemic.
由于病毒颗粒具有空气传播的特性,充足的通风已被确定为一种合适的减缓病毒传播的策略。虽然国家和国际卫生机构都规定了“开窗通风换气”的措施,但在许多空气污染严重的发展中国家,这可能会带来意想不到的有害后果。在本研究中,评估了不同场景下的颗粒物(PM)暴露浓度以及因PM导致的死亡概率。使用了一个新冠病毒空气传播感染风险评估器来估计在各种通勤微环境中通过气溶胶传播感染的概率,这些微环境包括:(a)空调出租车;(b)非空调出租车;(c)公交车;(d)人力三轮车。以下是在封锁前、封锁期间和解除封锁后这四种类型车辆中的估计暴露浓度:空调出租车(17.16微克/立方米、4.52微克/立方米和25.09微克/立方米);非空调出租车:(28.74微克/立方米、7.56微克/立方米、42.01微克/立方米);公交车(21.79微克/立方米、5.73微克/立方米、31.86微克/立方米);人力三轮车(51.30微克/立方米、3.50微克/立方米、75微克/立方米)。解除封锁后,因PM导致的死亡概率在人力三轮车中最高(5.67×10),其次是非空调出租车(2.07×10)、公交车(1.39×10)和空调出租车(1.02×10)。对于感染新冠病毒的概率,这种风险顺序则相反,空调出租车的感染概率最高(6.10×10),其次是非空调出租车(1.71×10)、公交车(1.42×10),人力三轮车的风险最低(1.99×10)。本研究结果表明,在新冠疫情期间,每小时通风或换气次数(ACH)较高的车辆应比其他交通方式更受青睐。