IST Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Max Planck Research Group Dynamics of Social Behavior, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Ploen, Germany.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1292-1302. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01114-8. Epub 2021 May 13.
Direct and indirect reciprocity are key mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. Direct reciprocity means that individuals use their own experience to decide whether to cooperate with another person. Indirect reciprocity means that they also consider the experiences of others. Although these two mechanisms are intertwined, they are typically studied in isolation. Here, we introduce a mathematical framework that allows us to explore both kinds of reciprocity simultaneously. We show that the well-known 'generous tit-for-tat' strategy of direct reciprocity has a natural analogue in indirect reciprocity, which we call 'generous scoring'. Using an equilibrium analysis, we characterize under which conditions either of the two strategies can maintain cooperation. With simulations, we additionally explore which kind of reciprocity evolves when members of a population engage in social learning to adapt to their environment. Our results draw unexpected connections between direct and indirect reciprocity while highlighting important differences regarding their evolvability.
直接互惠和间接互惠是合作进化的关键机制。直接互惠是指个体根据自己的经验来决定是否与另一个人合作。间接互惠是指他们也会考虑他人的经验。尽管这两种机制相互交织,但通常是分开研究的。在这里,我们引入了一个数学框架,使我们能够同时探索这两种互惠。我们表明,直接互惠中著名的“慷慨的一报还一报”策略在间接互惠中有一个自然的类似物,我们称之为“慷慨评分”。通过均衡分析,我们描述了在哪些条件下这两种策略中的任何一种都可以维持合作。通过模拟,我们还探索了当群体成员通过社会学习来适应环境时,哪种互惠更容易进化。我们的研究结果在直接互惠和间接互惠之间建立了意想不到的联系,同时强调了它们在可进化性方面的重要差异。