Ataallahi Mohammad, Nejad Jalil Ghassemi, Song Jun-Ik, Kim Jin-Soo, Park Kyu-Hyun
College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.
Team of an Educational Program for Specialists in Global Animal Science, Brain Korea 21 Plus Project, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
J Anim Sci Technol. 2020 Nov;62(6):884-892. doi: 10.5187/jast.2020.62.6.884. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
Corticosterone is known as a biological stress index in many species including birds. Feather corticosterone concentration (FCC) has increasingly been used as a measure for chronic stress status in broiler chickens. As sample preparation is the first step of analytical process, different techniques of feather matrix disruption need to be validated for obtaining better result in analysing corticosterone extraction. The current study was a validation of pulverizing the feather by bead beater (BB) and surgical scissors (SS) processing prior to corticosterone extraction in feather of broiler chickens. The type of feather processing prior to the hormone extraction may alter the final output. Thereby, finding a standard method according to laboratory facilities is pivotal. This study carried out to determine the effects of feather pulverization methods on the extraction amount of corticosterone in broiler chickens. Feathers were sampled from four weeks old Ross 308 broiler chickens (n = 12 birds). All broiler chickens were kept under the same environmental condition and had access to feed and water. Feather samples were assigned to one of the following processing methods 1) using a BB for pulverizing and 2) using a SS for chopping into tiny pieces. Each sample was duplicated into two wells during enzyme immunoassay (EIA) analysis to improve the accuracy of the obtained data. The results showed lower standard errors and constant output of FCC by using the BB method compared with the SS method. Overall comparison of FCC showed a significantly higher ( < 0.001) amount of the FCC in the BB compared with the SS. Overall, using the BB method is recommended over the SS method for feather processing due to the ability to homogenize a large number of samples simultaneously, ease of use and greater extraction of feather corticosterone.
皮质酮在包括鸟类在内的许多物种中被视为一种生物应激指标。羽毛皮质酮浓度(FCC)越来越多地被用作衡量肉鸡慢性应激状态的指标。由于样品制备是分析过程的第一步,因此需要对不同的羽毛基质破坏技术进行验证,以便在分析皮质酮提取时获得更好的结果。本研究是对在提取肉鸡羽毛中的皮质酮之前,使用珠磨仪(BB)和手术剪刀(SS)处理来粉碎羽毛的方法进行验证。激素提取前的羽毛处理类型可能会改变最终结果。因此,根据实验室设施找到一种标准方法至关重要。本研究旨在确定羽毛粉碎方法对肉鸡皮质酮提取量的影响。从4周龄的罗斯308肉鸡(n = 12只)采集羽毛样本。所有肉鸡都饲养在相同的环境条件下,可自由采食和饮水。将羽毛样本分配到以下处理方法之一:1)使用BB进行粉碎,2)使用SS切成小碎片。在酶免疫分析(EIA)过程中,每个样本重复放入两个孔中,以提高所获数据的准确性。结果表明,与SS方法相比,使用BB方法时FCC的标准误差更低且输出恒定。FCC的总体比较显示,BB组的FCC量显著高于SS组(< 0.001)。总体而言,由于能够同时均匀处理大量样本、使用方便且能更好地提取羽毛皮质酮,因此推荐使用BB方法而非SS方法进行羽毛处理。