Johansson Elias, Fox Allan J
Department Clinical Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden and Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine (WCMM), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2022 Jan;49(1):55-61. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2021.50. Epub 2021 May 14.
Symptomatic carotid near-occlusion is often described as rare. Recent studies have shown that near-occlusions are overlooked, especially near-occlusion without full collapse (with a small but normal-appearing distal internal carotid artery).
To assess the prevalence of near-occlusion among symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis, incidence of symptomatic near-occlusion, and review the literature.
Prospective controlled single-center cross-sectional study. Consecutive cases with symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis were examined with computed tomography angiography (CTA). The CTAs were assessed for near-occlusion by two observers. A systematic literature review was performed with emphasis on how study design affects prevalence estimate.
Totally, 186 patients with symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis were included, 34% (n = 63, 95% CI 27, 41) had near-occlusion. The incidence of symptomatic near-occlusion was 3.4 (95% CI 2.5, 4.2) per 100,000 person-years. Inter-rater κ was 0.71. The average prevalence of near-occlusion among symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis was higher in studies with good design (30%, range 27%-34%) than studies without good design (9%, range 2%-10%).
Near-occlusion is common variant of symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis, both in the current study and in all previous studies of good design. Studies that suggest that near-occlusion is rare have had methodological issues.
有症状的颈动脉近闭塞通常被描述为罕见。近期研究表明,近闭塞情况常被忽视,尤其是未完全塌陷的近闭塞(即颈内动脉远端虽细小但外观正常)。
评估有症状的颈动脉狭窄≥50%患者中近闭塞的患病率、有症状近闭塞的发病率,并对文献进行综述。
前瞻性对照单中心横断面研究。对有症状的颈动脉狭窄≥50%的连续病例进行计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)检查。由两名观察者对CTA进行近闭塞评估。进行系统的文献综述,重点关注研究设计如何影响患病率估计。
共纳入186例有症状的颈动脉狭窄≥50%的患者,34%(n = 63,95%CI 27,41)存在近闭塞。有症状近闭塞的发病率为每10万人年3.4(95%CI 2.5,4.2)。观察者间κ值为0.71。设计良好的研究中,有症状的颈动脉狭窄≥50%患者近闭塞的平均患病率(30%,范围27% - 34%)高于设计不佳的研究(9%,范围2% - 10%)。
在本研究以及所有设计良好的既往研究中,近闭塞是有症状的颈动脉狭窄≥50%的常见变体。表明近闭塞罕见的研究存在方法学问题。