Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Department of Surgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Popul Health Manag. 2021 Dec;24(6):664-674. doi: 10.1089/pop.2020.0361. Epub 2021 May 14.
Using telemedicine to improve asthma management in underserved communities has been shown to be highly effective. However, program operating costs are perceived as the main barrier to dissemination and scaling up. This study evaluated whether a novel, evidence-based School-Based Telemedicine Enhanced Asthma Management (SB-TEAM) program, designed to overcome barriers to care for families of urban school-aged children, can be financially sustainable in real-world urban school settings. Eligible children (n = 400) had physician-diagnosed asthma with persistent or poorly controlled symptoms at baseline. Total costs included the cost of implementing and running the SB-TEAM program, asthma-related health care costs, cost of caregiver lost productivity in wages related to child illness, and school absenteeism fees. Using data from the SB-TEAM study and national data on wages and equipment costs, the authors modeled low, actual, and high-cost scenarios. The actual cost of administering the SB-TEAM program averaged $344 per child. Expenses incurred by families for medical care ($982), caregiver productivity cost ($415), and school absenteeism costs ($284) in SB-TEAM were not different from the costs in the control group ($1594, $492, and $318 [ > 0.05]). The study findings remained robust under sensitivity analyses for various state- and school-specific regulations, staffing requirements, and wages. The authors concluded that the SB-TEAM program operating costs may be offset by the reduction in health care costs, caregiver lost wages, and school absenteeism associated with the program health benefit.
利用远程医疗改善服务不足社区的哮喘管理已被证明非常有效。然而,项目运营成本被认为是推广和扩大规模的主要障碍。本研究评估了一种新的、基于证据的基于学校的远程医疗增强哮喘管理(SB-TEAM)计划,旨在克服城市学龄儿童家庭护理的障碍,是否可以在真实的城市学校环境中实现财务可持续性。符合条件的儿童(n=400)在基线时有医生诊断的哮喘,且有持续或控制不佳的症状。总费用包括实施和运行 SB-TEAM 计划的成本、与哮喘相关的医疗保健费用、与儿童疾病相关的护理人员工资损失生产力的成本以及学校缺勤费用。使用 SB-TEAM 研究的数据和关于工资和设备成本的国家数据,作者构建了低成本、实际成本和高成本情景。SB-TEAM 计划的管理平均每孩子花费 344 美元。SB-TEAM 中家庭的医疗费用(982 美元)、护理人员生产力成本(415 美元)和学校缺勤成本(284 美元)与对照组(1594 美元、492 美元和 318 美元[>0.05])没有不同。在对各种州和学校特定法规、人员配备要求和工资进行敏感性分析后,研究结果仍然稳健。作者得出结论,SB-TEAM 计划的运营成本可能会因与该计划健康效益相关的医疗保健费用、护理人员工资损失和学校缺勤减少而得到抵消。