Suppr超能文献

幕后:推动社会-生态系统框架运作的科学网络。

Behind the scenes: Scientific networks driving the operationalization of the Social-Ecological System framework.

机构信息

DEUA, Centro de Estudios Demográficos Urbanos y Ambientales (CEDUA), El Colegio de México A.C., Carretera Picacho Ajusco 20, Col. Ampliación Fuentes del Pedregal, C.P. 14110 Tlalpan, Ciudad de México, Mexico.

Centro de Estudios Demográficos Urbanos y Ambientales (CEDUA), El Colegio de México A.C., Carretera Picacho Ajusco 20, Col. Ampliación Fuentes del Pedregal, C.P. 14110 Tlalpan, Ciudad de México, Mexico.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 15;787:147473. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147473. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

Abstract

The analytical framework of Social-Ecological Systems (SES) has been endorsed worldwide because of its ability to describe the complex feedback relationships between social and ecological subsystems. The framework promotes multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity, with the expectation that studies will be carried out through groups and collaborative networks via the application of mixed research methods. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature to understand whether the operationalization of the SES framework has been achieved in this way. For this, we used the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Scopus database. Based on the results, there is wide methodological plurality, although there are few studies that have opted for mixed methods that capture the complexity of an SES. In terms of scientific networks, we found that the community is composed mainly of consolidated groups of scientists from the Global North in which authors-researchers with betweenness centrality roles were identified, who connect the entire network, reaching the Global South, where peripheral groups, which are barely consolidated and develop their studies, mostly in their own regions, prevail.

摘要

社会-生态系统(SES)分析框架因其能够描述社会和生态子系统之间复杂的反馈关系而在全球范围内得到认可。该框架促进了多学科和跨学科的研究,期望通过混合研究方法的应用,通过小组和合作网络进行研究。在这项研究中,我们对科学文献进行了系统回顾,以了解 SES 框架的操作是否以这种方式实现。为此,我们使用了 Cochrane 干预系统评价手册和 Scopus 数据库。基于结果,虽然有少数研究选择了混合方法来捕捉 SES 的复杂性,但方法的多样性很广泛。在科学网络方面,我们发现该社区主要由来自北方国家的巩固的科学家群体组成,其中确定了具有中介中心度作用的作者-研究人员,他们连接整个网络,到达南方国家,那里存在边缘群体,这些群体几乎没有巩固,并且主要在自己的地区开展研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验