Suppr超能文献

提高专家技术预测的策略。

A strategy to improve expert technology forecasts.

机构信息

Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 25;118(21). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021558118.

Abstract

Forecasts of the future cost and performance of technologies are often used to support decision-making. However, retrospective reviews find that many forecasts made by experts are not very accurate and are often seriously overconfident, with realized values too frequently falling outside of forecasted ranges. Here, we outline a hybrid approach to expert elicitation that we believe might improve forecasts of future technologies. The proposed approach iteratively combines the judgments of technical domain experts with those of experts who are knowledgeable about broader issues of technology adoption and public policy. We motivate the approach with results from a pilot study designed to help forecasters think systematically about factors beyond the technology itself that may shape its future, such as policy, economic, and social factors. Forecasters who received briefings on these topics provided wider forecast intervals than those receiving no assistance.

摘要

对未来技术的成本和性能的预测通常被用来支持决策。然而,回顾性研究发现,许多专家做出的预测并不十分准确,而且往往过于自信,实际价值经常超出预测范围。在这里,我们概述了一种混合的专家征询方法,我们相信这可能会提高对未来技术的预测。所提出的方法迭代地结合了技术领域专家的判断和那些对技术采用和公共政策等更广泛问题有知识的专家的判断。我们用一项旨在帮助预测者系统地思考可能影响技术未来的技术本身以外的因素(如政策、经济和社会因素)的试点研究的结果来说明该方法。接受了这些主题介绍的预测者提供的预测区间比没有接受帮助的预测者提供的预测区间要宽。

相似文献

1
A strategy to improve expert technology forecasts.提高专家技术预测的策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 25;118(21). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021558118.
3
Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy.利用(和滥用)专家判断支持公共政策决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7176-84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319946111. Epub 2014 May 12.
4
Quantifying machine influence over human forecasters.量化机器对人类预测者的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 29;10(1):15940. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72690-4.
10
Compromising improves forecasting.妥协能改善预测。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 May 17;10(5):221216. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221216. eCollection 2023 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Empirical prediction intervals improve energy forecasting.经验预测区间可提高能源预测精度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 15;114(33):8752-8757. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619938114. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
2
How Can Decision Making Be Improved?如何改进决策?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;4(4):379-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01142.x.
3
Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy.利用(和滥用)专家判断支持公共政策决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7176-84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319946111. Epub 2014 May 12.
4
Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament.赢得地缘政治预测锦标赛的心理策略。
Psychol Sci. 2014 May 1;25(5):1106-15. doi: 10.1177/0956797614524255. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
5
Think twice and then: combining or choosing in dialectical bootstrapping?再三思考:在辩证启发式中结合还是选择?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):218-32. doi: 10.1037/a0034054. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
6
Expert assessments of the cost of light water small modular reactors.轻水小型模块化反应堆成本的专家评估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 11;110(24):9686-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300195110. Epub 2013 May 28.
7
Expert assessments of future photovoltaic technologies.未来光伏技术的专家评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Dec 15;42(24):9031-8. doi: 10.1021/es8014088.
8
Overconfidence in interval estimates.区间估计中的过度自信。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):299-314. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.299.
9
Realism of confidence judgments.
Psychol Rev. 1961 Jan;68:33-45. doi: 10.1037/h0040274.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验