• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从生态系统服务角度看城市自然、身体活动与健康。

An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health.

机构信息

Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;

Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018472118.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2018472118
PMID:33990458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8179134/
Abstract

Nature underpins human well-being in critical ways, especially in health. Nature provides pollination of nutritious crops, purification of drinking water, protection from floods, and climate security, among other well-studied health benefits. A crucial, yet challenging, research frontier is clarifying how nature promotes physical activity for its many mental and physical health benefits, particularly in densely populated cities with scarce and dwindling access to nature. Here we frame this frontier by conceptually developing a spatial decision-support tool that shows where, how, and for whom urban nature promotes physical activity, to inform urban greening efforts and broader health assessments. We synthesize what is known, present a model framework, and detail the model steps and data needs that can yield generalizable spatial models and an effective tool for assessing the urban nature-physical activity relationship. Current knowledge supports an initial model that can distinguish broad trends and enrich urban planning, spatial policy, and public health decisions. New, iterative research and application will reveal the importance of different types of urban nature, the different subpopulations who will benefit from it, and nature's potential contribution to creating more equitable, green, livable cities with active inhabitants.

摘要

自然以关键的方式支撑着人类的福祉,尤其是在健康方面。自然提供了营养作物的授粉、饮用水的净化、洪水的防护以及气候安全等诸多经充分研究证实的健康益处。一个关键但具有挑战性的研究前沿是阐明自然如何促进身体活动,从而带来许多身心健康益处,尤其是在人口密集、自然匮乏且日益减少的城市。在这里,我们通过概念性地开发一个空间决策支持工具来构建这个前沿,该工具展示了城市自然环境在何处、如何以及为谁促进身体活动,以指导城市绿化工作和更广泛的健康评估。我们综合了已知的知识,提出了一个模型框架,并详细说明了可以产生可推广的空间模型和评估城市自然与身体活动关系的有效工具的模型步骤和数据需求。目前的知识支持一个初始模型,可以区分广泛的趋势并丰富城市规划、空间政策和公共卫生决策。新的迭代研究和应用将揭示不同类型的城市自然、将从中受益的不同人群以及自然在创造更公平、绿色、宜居且充满活力的城市方面的潜在贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e308/8179134/0259948ef96b/pnas.2018472118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e308/8179134/b5b2f8f9bc4a/pnas.2018472118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e308/8179134/c1b747001246/pnas.2018472118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e308/8179134/0259948ef96b/pnas.2018472118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e308/8179134/b5b2f8f9bc4a/pnas.2018472118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e308/8179134/c1b747001246/pnas.2018472118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e308/8179134/0259948ef96b/pnas.2018472118fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health.从生态系统服务角度看城市自然、身体活动与健康。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018472118.
2
The potential of nature-based solutions to deliver ecologically just cities: Lessons for research and urban planning from a systematic literature review.基于自然的解决方案在实现生态公正城市方面的潜力:系统文献回顾为研究和城市规划提供的启示。
Ambio. 2022 Jan;51(1):167-182. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01553-7. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
3
Urban health: an example of a "health in all policies" approach in the context of SDGs implementation.城市健康:在实现可持续发展目标背景下“所有政策促进健康”方法的一个范例。
Global Health. 2019 Dec 18;15(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0529-z.
4
A spatial framework for targeting urban planning for pollinators and people with local stakeholders: A route to healthy, blossoming communities?与当地利益相关者共同制定针对传粉者和人类的城市规划空间框架:通往健康、繁花似锦社区的途径?
Environ Res. 2017 Oct;158:255-268. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
5
Mitigating and adapting to climate change: multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure.减轻和适应气候变化:绿色城市基础设施的多功能和多尺度评估
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
6
Green infrastructure and ecosystem services - is the devil in the detail?绿色基础设施与生态系统服务——细节决定成败?
Ann Bot. 2016 Sep;118(3):377-91. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw129. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
7
Creating urban green infrastructure where it is needed - A spatial ecosystem service-based decision analysis of green roofs in Barcelona.在需要的地方创建城市绿色基础设施 - 基于空间生态系统服务的巴塞罗那绿色屋顶决策分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 10;707:135487. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135487. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Urban green infrastructure: A review on valuation toolkits from an urban planning perspective.城市绿色基础设施:从城市规划角度看评估工具包综述。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Aug 1;267:110603. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110603. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
9
Toward improved public health outcomes from urban nature.迈向因城市自然环境而改善的公共卫生成果。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105(3):470-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302324. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
10
Advancing Sustainability through Urban Green Space: Cultural Ecosystem Services, Equity, and Social Determinants of Health.通过城市绿色空间推进可持续发展:文化生态系统服务、公平性与健康的社会决定因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Feb 5;13(2):196. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13020196.

引用本文的文献

1
Land-use history causes differences in park nighttime cooling capacity and forest structure.土地利用历史导致公园夜间降温能力和森林结构存在差异。
Ecol Appl. 2025 Jul;35(5):e70082. doi: 10.1002/eap.70082.
2
Greenspace Morphology and Preterm Birth: A State-Wide Study in Georgia, United States (2001-2016).绿地形态与早产:美国佐治亚州的一项全州范围研究(2001 - 2016年)
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Dec;132(12):127001. doi: 10.1289/EHP14571. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
3
Reassessing green exercise research: unveiling methodological gaps and pathways for progress.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining privilege and power in US urban parks and open space during the double crises of antiblack racism and COVID-19.在反黑人种族主义和新冠疫情这双重危机期间审视美国城市公园及开放空间中的特权与权力。
Socioecol Pract Res. 2021;3(1):55-70. doi: 10.1007/s42532-020-00070-3. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
2
Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: A conceptual framework.生物多样性与人类健康关联的途径:概念框架。
Environ Int. 2021 May;150:106420. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106420. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
3
Redlines and Greenspace: The Relationship between Historical Redlining and 2010 Greenspace across the United States.
重新评估绿色运动研究:揭示方法学差距与进步途径。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Nov 19;6:1449059. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1449059. eCollection 2024.
4
Urban ecosystem services research in Russia: Systematic review on the state of the art.俄罗斯城市生态系统服务研究:对现有技术水平的系统综述
Ambio. 2025 Apr;54(4):577-602. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02102-8. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
5
How Green Space Justice in urban built-up areas affects public mental health: a moderated chain mediation model.城市建成区绿地公平性如何影响公众心理健康:一个有调节的链式中介模型。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;12:1442182. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1442182. eCollection 2024.
6
Satellite data for environmental justice: a scoping review of the literature in the United States.用于环境正义的卫星数据:美国文献的范围综述
Environ Res Lett. 2024;19(3). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad1fa4.
7
Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Utilisation of Community-Based Mental Health Care: A Comparative Study before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.环境条件与社区心理健康服务利用之间的关系:意大利 COVID-19 大流行前后的对比研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 22;21(6):661. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060661.
8
Does nature-based social prescription improve mental health outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于自然的社会处方是否能改善心理健康结局?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 25;12:1228271. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1228271. eCollection 2024.
9
Nature and Mental Health in Urban Texas: A NatureScore-Based Study.德克萨斯城市的自然与心理健康:基于自然评分的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 1;21(2):168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020168.
10
Gross ecosystem product (GEP): Quantifying nature for environmental and economic policy innovation.总生态系统产品(GEP):为环境和经济政策创新量化自然。
Ambio. 2023 Dec;52(12):1952-1967. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01948-8. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
红线与绿地:美国历史红线与 2010 年绿地之间的关系。
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Jan;129(1):17006. doi: 10.1289/EHP7495. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
4
Use of the prevented fraction for the population to determine deaths averted by existing prevalence of physical activity: a descriptive study.利用人群的预防部分来确定因现有体力活动流行率而避免的死亡人数:一项描述性研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e920-e930. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30211-4.
5
Nature Prescriptions for Health: A Review of Evidence and Research Opportunities.自然疗法与健康:循证评价与研究机遇。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;17(12):4213. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124213.
6
Built Environment, Physical Activity, and Obesity: Findings from the International Physical Activity and Environment Network (IPEN) Adult Study.建筑环境、身体活动与肥胖:国际身体活动与环境网络(IPEN)成人研究结果。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:119-139. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043657.
7
Towards nationally harmonized mapping and quantification of ecosystem services.面向全国统一的生态系统服务制图与量化。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 10;703:134973. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134973. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
8
Spatial dimensions of the influence of urban green-blue spaces on human health: A systematic review.城市蓝绿空间对人类健康影响的空间维度:系统综述。
Environ Res. 2020 Jan;180:108869. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108869. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
9
Global modeling of nature's contributions to people.全球自然贡献评估模型
Science. 2019 Oct 11;366(6462):255-258. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw3372.
10
Associations between the physical environment and park-based physical activity: A systematic review.物理环境与基于公园的体育活动之间的关联:一项系统综述。
J Sport Health Sci. 2019 Sep;8(5):412-421. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 14.