Abdel-Ghaffar Hala Saad, Abdel-Wahab Amani Hassan, Roushdy Mohammed Mahmoud
Assiut University, Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Assiut, Egypt.
Assiut University, Faculty of Medicine, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Assiut, Egypt.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2024 Sep-Oct;74(5):744169. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.030. Epub 2021 May 12.
We investigated the performance of the Perfusion Index (PI) derived from pulse oximetry waveform as a tool for assessment of anesthetic depth in comparison with A-line Autoregression Index (AAI) derived from analysis of Middle-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (MLAEP) waveform integrated by aepEXplus monitor in children receiving sevoflurane anesthesia for tonsillectomy.
Forty-one patients (4...12 years old) were included in this study. The PI and AAI were recorded simultaneously every minute during different stages of anesthesia delivery. The statistical tests included descriptive analysis, significance tests, correlation tests, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The AAI served as a reference.
The PI significantly decreased during light anesthesia and recovery, and significantly increased during deeper planes of anesthesia, with an inverse mirror-image relationship with the AAI. A negative correlation of low to moderate degree was detected between PI and AAI during the study (p.ß>.ß0.05), that reached a statistical significance at the 5th minute during sevoflurane mask induction (r.ß=.ß...0.457, p.ß=.ß0.008). ROC analysis at an AAI < 25 extracted the best cut-off value for PI before intubation as 1.48 (AUC.ß=.ß0.698 [0.537...0.859], 94.4% sensitivity, 44.5% specificity) and at 10-minute intraoperatively as 2.4 (AUC.ß=.ß0.537 [0.354...0.721], 91.7% sensitivity, 31% specificity). During recovery, at an AAI.ß....ß50, the best cutoff was 1.82 (AUC.ß=.ß0.661 [0.46...0.863], 100% sensitivity and 50% specificity) 2 minutes before spontaneous eye opening.
Compared with the AAI, the PI can track changes in depth of anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy under sevoflurane anesthesia.
Clinical Trials. Gov. Identifier: NCT03412214.
我们研究了通过脉搏血氧饱和度波形得出的灌注指数(PI)作为评估麻醉深度工具的性能,并与通过aepEXplus监测仪分析中潜伏期听觉诱发电位(MLAEP)波形得出的A线自回归指数(AAI)进行比较,这些儿童在接受扁桃体切除术中使用七氟醚麻醉。
本研究纳入了41例患者(4至12岁)。在麻醉给药的不同阶段,每分钟同时记录PI和AAI。统计检验包括描述性分析、显著性检验、相关性检验和受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线。以AAI作为参考。
PI在浅麻醉和恢复期间显著降低,在较深麻醉阶段显著升高,与AAI呈反向镜像关系。研究期间PI与AAI之间检测到低至中度的负相关(p>0.05),在七氟醚面罩诱导期间第5分钟达到统计学显著性(r=-0.457,p=0.008)。当AAI<25时,ROC分析得出插管前PI的最佳截断值为1.48(AUC=0.698[0.537至0.859],灵敏度94.4%,特异性44.5%),术中10分钟时为2.4(AUC=0.537[0.354至0.721],灵敏度91.7%,特异性31%)。在恢复期间,当AAI>50时,自发睁眼2分钟前的最佳截断值为1.82(AUC=0.661[0.46至0.863],灵敏度100%,特异性50%)。
与AAI相比,PI可以追踪接受七氟醚麻醉的扁桃体切除术患儿的麻醉深度变化。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03412214。