Wilkoff Bruce L, Donnellan Eoin, Himes Adam, Ben Johnson W, Haddad Tarek, Lulic Thomas, Lexcen Daniel R, Crossley George H
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Sep;18(9):1605-1612. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 May 14.
Development of a cardiac lead fracture model has the potential to differentiate well-performing lead designs from poor performing ones and could aid in future lead development.
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a predictive model for lead fracture and validate the results generated by the model by comparing them to observed 10-year implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead fracture-free survival.
The model presented here uses a combination of in vivo patient data, in vitro conductor fatigue test data, and statistical simulation to predict the fracture-free survival of cardiac leads. The model was validated by comparing the results to human clinical performance data from the Medtronic Sprint Fidelis (Minneapolis, MN) models 6931 (single coil, active fixation) and 6949 (dual coil, active fixation), as well as the Quattro model 6947 (dual coil, active fixation).
Median patient age in the single coil Fidelis 6931 population (64 years) was less than in the dual coil Fidelis 6949 and Quattro populations (68 years). Modeled and observed fracture-free survival for Quattro (>97%) was superior to that for Fidelis (<94%). The modeled survival agreed with the observed fracture-free survival data. The average model error was 0.3% (SD 1.2%).
This model for cardiac lead fracture-free survival using in vivo lead bending measurements and in vitro bench testing can be used to predict lead performance as observed by alignment with field survival data.
建立心脏导线断裂模型有可能区分性能良好的导线设计与性能不佳的导线设计,并有助于未来导线的研发。
本研究的目的是展示一种导线断裂预测模型,并通过将模型生成的结果与观察到的10年植入式心律转复除颤器导线无断裂生存率进行比较,来验证该模型的结果。
本文提出的模型结合了体内患者数据、体外导体疲劳测试数据和统计模拟,以预测心脏导线的无断裂生存率。通过将结果与美敦力Sprint Fidelis(明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)6931型(单线圈,主动固定)和6949型(双线圈,主动固定)以及Quattro 6947型(双线圈,主动固定)的人类临床性能数据进行比较,对该模型进行了验证。
单线圈Fidelis 6931人群的患者年龄中位数(64岁)低于双线圈Fidelis 6949和Quattro人群(68岁)。Quattro的模型预测和观察到的无断裂生存率(>97%)优于Fidelis(<94%)。模型预测的生存率与观察到的无断裂生存率数据一致。平均模型误差为0.3%(标准差1.2%)。
这种利用体内导线弯曲测量和体外台架测试的心脏导线无断裂生存率模型,可用于通过与实际生存率数据对比来预测导线性能。