Professor of Modern European Literature, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200043. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0043. Epub 2021 May 17.
This article outlines how the historical human sciences see 'culture' and its dynamic developments over time and over generations. The operations of human culture are systemically self-reflexive and, as a result, exhibit a complexity that sets them apart, as a semiotic system, from mere communicative information transfer. Peculiar to this complexity is the two-way interaction between the 'etic' substance of the cultural exchanges and their 'emic' function. Cultural signals require parallel etic/emic processing at stacked levels of complexity. As a result of this complexity, the homeostasis and autopoiesis of human culture, including its dynamics and development over time, cannot be explained fully in terms of responses to the physical environment. How, this article ponders by way of conclusion, can an evolutionary approach be reconciled with these characteristics of human culture, or the notion of culture be applied to evolutionary modelling? This article is part of the theme issue 'Foundations of cultural evolution'.
本文概述了历史人类科学如何看待“文化”及其随时间和代际的动态发展。人类文化的运作具有系统性的自我反思,因此表现出一种复杂性,使其作为一个符号系统,与单纯的交际信息传递区分开来。这种复杂性的特点是文化交流的“客观”实质与其“主观”功能之间的双向相互作用。文化信号需要在复杂程度不同的层次上进行并行的客观/主观处理。由于这种复杂性,人类文化的内稳态和自我生成,包括其随时间的动态和发展,不能完全用对物理环境的反应来解释。本文通过结论部分思考,进化方法如何能够与人类文化的这些特征相协调,或者文化的概念如何能够应用于进化建模?本文是主题为“文化进化基础”的特刊的一部分。