Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07745, Germany.
ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra 2700, Australia.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200056. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0056. Epub 2021 May 17.
Modern phylogenetic methods are increasingly being used to address questions about macro-level patterns in cultural evolution. These methods can illuminate the unobservable histories of cultural traits and identify the evolutionary drivers of trait change over time, but their application is not without pitfalls. Here, we outline the current scope of research in cultural tree thinking, highlighting a toolkit of best practices to navigate and avoid the pitfalls and 'abuses' associated with their application. We emphasize two principles that support the appropriate application of phylogenetic methodologies in cross-cultural research: researchers should (1) draw on multiple lines of evidence when deciding if and which types of phylogenetic methods and models are suitable for their cross-cultural data, and (2) carefully consider how different cultural traits might have different evolutionary histories across space and time. When used appropriately phylogenetic methods can provide powerful insights into the processes of evolutionary change that have shaped the broad patterns of human history. This article is part of the theme issue 'Foundations of cultural evolution'.
现代系统发生学方法越来越多地被用于解决文化进化中宏观模式的问题。这些方法可以阐明文化特征的不可观察历史,并确定特征随时间变化的进化驱动因素,但它们的应用并非没有陷阱。在这里,我们概述了文化树思维的当前研究范围,重点介绍了一套最佳实践工具,以应对和避免与应用相关的陷阱和“滥用”。我们强调了支持在跨文化研究中适当应用系统发生学方法的两个原则:研究人员应该(1)在决定是否以及哪种类型的系统发生学方法和模型适合他们的跨文化数据时,参考多种证据,以及(2)仔细考虑不同的文化特征在空间和时间上可能具有不同的进化历史。当使用得当,系统发生学方法可以为塑造人类历史广泛模式的进化变化过程提供有力的见解。本文是主题为“文化进化基础”的特刊的一部分。