• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与就地养老相关的重要社区概念化:一项范围综述

The conceptualisation of vital communities related to ageing in place: a scoping review.

作者信息

Pani-Harreman Katinka E, van Duren Joop M A, Kempen Gertrudis I J M, Bours Gerrie J J W

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Research Centre for Facility Management, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Nieuw Eyckholt 300, 6419 DJ Heerlen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2021 May 10;19(1):49-62. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00622-w. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.1007/s10433-021-00622-w
PMID:33994901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8109845/
Abstract

Older people today are more likely to age in their own private living environment. However, many face declining health and/or other issues that affect their ability to live independently and necessitate additional support. Such support can be provided by formal networks, but a considerable part can also be offered by informal networks of older people themselves. Going beyond these networks, older people can additionally and perhaps even more substantially benefit from . Nevertheless, even though this term is increasingly common in the literature, its meaning remains indistinct. A more thorough understanding of this concept might provide valuable knowledge that health care professionals, researchers and community workers can use to offer meaningful and effective support. The purpose of this paper is to draw on existing empirical research on vital communities to build knowledge of the different descriptions and dimensions of the concept. Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology was adopted. Our search, conducted on 23 March 2020 and updated on 06 January 2021, yielded 4433 articles, of which six articles were included in the scoping review. We deduced that the conceptualisation of a vital community is based on three dimensions: the aim of a vital community, the processes behind a vital community and the typical characteristics of a vital community. None of the selected studies have mapped all three dimensions. Nevertheless, we assume that understanding all three matters when vital communities aim to contribute to the quality of life of people ageing in place.

摘要

如今,老年人更有可能在自己的私人生活环境中变老。然而,许多人面临健康状况下降和/或其他问题,这些问题影响了他们独立生活的能力,需要额外的支持。这种支持可以由正式网络提供,但很大一部分也可以由老年人自身的非正式网络提供。除了这些网络,老年人还可以从……中额外受益,甚至可能受益更多。然而,尽管这个术语在文献中越来越常见,但其含义仍然不明确。对这一概念更深入的理解可能会提供有价值的知识,医疗保健专业人员、研究人员和社区工作者可以利用这些知识提供有意义和有效的支持。本文的目的是借鉴关于活力社区的现有实证研究,以构建对该概念不同描述和维度的认识。采用了阿克西和奥马利的范围审查方法。我们于2020年3月23日进行搜索,并于2021年1月6日更新,共获得4433篇文章,其中6篇文章被纳入范围审查。我们推断,活力社区概念的形成基于三个维度:活力社区的目标、活力社区背后的过程以及活力社区的典型特征。所选研究均未涵盖所有这三个维度。然而,我们认为,当活力社区旨在为就地养老的人们的生活质量做出贡献时,理解所有这三个维度都很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82b3/8881566/a135fb028b2c/10433_2021_622_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82b3/8881566/29973bcb3665/10433_2021_622_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82b3/8881566/a135fb028b2c/10433_2021_622_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82b3/8881566/29973bcb3665/10433_2021_622_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82b3/8881566/a135fb028b2c/10433_2021_622_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The conceptualisation of vital communities related to ageing in place: a scoping review.与就地养老相关的重要社区概念化:一项范围综述
Eur J Ageing. 2021 May 10;19(1):49-62. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00622-w. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework.强化范围研究方法学:一个大型跨专业团队对阿斯基和奥马利框架的应用经验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 23;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48.
4
Establishing a research partnership for delivering palliative and end-of-life care for older people in rural and remote areas: a formative mixed-methods study.建立农村和偏远地区老年人姑息治疗与临终关怀研究伙伴关系:一项形成性混合方法研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Feb 26:1-20. doi: 10.3310/RWSG7439.
5
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
6
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
7
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Older people's experiences of elder abuse in residential care settings: A scoping review.老年人在住宿护理环境中遭受虐待的体验:范围综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jun;80(6):2214-2227. doi: 10.1111/jan.15992. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
10
Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: protocol for a scoping review.自杀行为和在线健康社区中的调节支持:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 20;10(1):e034162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034162.

引用本文的文献

1
How do the existing homecare services correspond with the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home? A qualitative interview study with multiple stakeholders.现有的居家护理服务如何与居家老年人偏爱的服务生态系统相匹配?一项针对多个利益相关者的定性访谈研究。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 21;4:1294320. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1294320. eCollection 2024.
2
Place Attachment and Aging in Place: Preferences and Disruptions.地方依附与原地老化:偏好与干扰。
Res Aging. 2024 Mar-Apr;46(3-4):179-196. doi: 10.1177/01640275231209683. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
3
Stakeholder perspectives on the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home: a qualitative interview study.
利益相关者对居家老年人首选服务生态系统的观点:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04303-4.
4
What is a "Good Life": Protocol for a qualitative study to explore the viewpoint of older persons.“美好生活”是什么:一项探索老年人观点的定性研究方案。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261741. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261741. eCollection 2021.
5
Life Experiences with Using Community Care among People with Severe Physical Disabilities: A Comparative Analysis between South Korea and Japan.重度身体残疾者使用社区护理的生活体验:韩国与日本的比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 9;17(24):9195. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249195.