Buchholz Michael B, Buchholz Timo, Wülfing Barbara
International Psychoanalytic University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 30;12:545966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.545966. eCollection 2021.
Conversation analysis (CA) of children-adult-interaction in various contexts has become an established field of research. However, has received limited attention in CA. In child therapy, the general psychotherapeutic practice of achieving empathy faces particular challenges. In relation to this, our contribution sets out three issues for investigation and analysis: the first one is that practices of achieving empathy must be preceded by efforts aiming to establish which kind of individualized conversation works with this child (Midgley, 2006). Psychotherapy process researchers in adult therapy (Stiles et al., 2015) have found that therapists "invent" a new therapy for each patient (Norcross and Wampold, 2018). The second issue is that it can be difficult for adults to understand the ways in which children express their conflicts and issues. In particular, play activities in therapy, e.g., with dolls, can open up additional scenarios of interaction. The play scenario can be used to disclose unformulated problems masked in everyday and family interactions. The third issue is how to respect the child's higher degree of vulnerability, compared with adult patients. How is it communicated and dealt with in therapy? We present an interaction analysis of a single case study of the first 20 min of a child therapy session with an adopted girl aged 4 years brought to treatment because of "unexplainable rage." The session was videotaped; parents granted permission. We analyze this session using an applied version of CA. In our analysis, we describe "doing contrariness," as a conversational practice producing epistemic and affiliative disruptions, while "avoiding doing contrariness" and "remedying contrariness" are strategies for preserving or restoring the affiliative dimension of a relationship (in child therapy). We show how these practices operate in various modes and how they are used by both parties in our case study to variously aid and impedethe achievement of empathy and understanding.
对不同情境下儿童与成人互动的会话分析(CA)已成为一个既定的研究领域。然而,[此处原文缺失相关内容]在会话分析中受到的关注有限。在儿童治疗中,实现共情的一般心理治疗实践面临着特殊挑战。与此相关,我们的贡献提出了三个有待调查和分析的问题:第一个问题是,在实现共情的实践之前,必须先努力确定哪种个性化对话对这个孩子有效(米德格利,2006年)。成人治疗中的心理治疗过程研究人员(斯泰尔斯等人,2015年)发现,治疗师会为每个患者“发明”一种新的治疗方法(诺克罗斯和万波尔德,2018年)。第二个问题是,成年人可能难以理解儿童表达冲突和问题的方式。特别是治疗中的游戏活动,例如玩娃娃,可以开启额外的互动场景。游戏场景可用于揭示隐藏在日常和家庭互动中的未明确表达的问题。第三个问题是,与成年患者相比,如何尊重儿童更高程度的脆弱性。在治疗中如何传达和处理这种脆弱性?我们对一个4岁养女的儿童治疗 session 的前20分钟进行了单案例研究的互动分析,该女孩因“无法解释的愤怒”接受治疗。该 session 进行了录像;父母给予了许可。我们使用会话分析的应用版本对该 session 进行分析。在我们的分析中,我们将“表现出逆反”描述为一种产生认知和亲和性干扰的会话实践,而“避免表现出逆反 ”和“纠正逆反”是在儿童治疗中维护或恢复关系亲和维度的策略。我们展示了这些实践在各种模式下是如何运作的,以及在我们的案例研究中双方如何使用它们来不同程度地促进或阻碍共情和理解的实现。