Nixdorff Jan, Zablotski Yury, Hartmann Katrin, Dörfelt Rene
Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Apr 30;8:643966. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.643966. eCollection 2021.
The tongue is the standard site for placement of a pulse oximeter probe but is difficult to access during certain procedures such as dental and ophthalmic procedures and computerized tomography of the head. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new-generation reflectance pulse oximeter using the tail and tibia as sites for probe attachment. A total of 100 client-owned dogs that underwent anesthesia for various reasons were premedicated with butorphanol ( = 50; 0.2 mg/kg; group BUT) or butorphanol and dexmedetomidine ( = 50; 5 μg/kg; group DEX), administered intravenously. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with sevoflurane. A transmittance pulse oximeter probe was placed on the tongue and served as the reference standard. A reflectance probe was randomly placed on the tail base or the proximal tibia, and the position changed after testing. Signals from three consecutive measurements were obtained at each position. Failure was defined as "no signal," "low signal," or a pulse difference >10/min compared with the ECG heart rate. Data were analyzed using chi-square test, Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test, and Bland-Altman analysis. < 0.05 was considered significant. In both groups (BUT and DEX), failure rate was higher when the tibia and tail were used as probe sites compared with the tongue. In both groups, the failure rate was higher for the tibia than for the tail. Dexmedetomidine-induced vasoconstriction increased failure rate at all probe positions. The tail base, but not the tibia, is an acceptable position for reflectance pulse oximeter probes in dogs. The tongue remains the probe site of choice, if accessible.
舌头是放置脉搏血氧饱和度探头的标准部位,但在某些操作过程中难以触及,如牙科和眼科手术以及头部计算机断层扫描。本研究的目的是评估使用尾巴和胫骨作为探头附着部位的新一代反射式脉搏血氧饱和度仪的性能。共有100只因各种原因接受麻醉的客户拥有的犬只,静脉注射布托啡诺(n = 50;0.2 mg/kg;布托啡诺组)或布托啡诺和右美托咪定(n = 50;5 μg/kg;右美托咪定组)进行预处理。用丙泊酚诱导麻醉,用七氟醚维持麻醉。将透射式脉搏血氧饱和度探头放置在舌头上作为参考标准。将反射式探头随机放置在尾基部或胫骨近端,测试后改变位置。在每个位置获取连续三次测量的信号。失败定义为“无信号”、“低信号”或与心电图心率相比脉搏差异>10次/分钟。使用卡方检验、Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验和Bland-Altman分析对数据进行分析。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。在两组(布托啡诺组和右美托咪定组)中,与舌头相比,将胫骨和尾巴用作探头部位时失败率更高。在两组中,胫骨的失败率高于尾巴。右美托咪定引起的血管收缩增加了所有探头位置的失败率。对于犬只,尾基部(而非胫骨)是反射式脉搏血氧饱和度探头的可接受位置。如果可以触及,舌头仍然是首选的探头部位。