Suppr超能文献

对于穿着美式橄榄球制服的体温过高的人,常用的体温测量部位无法有效测量其核心体温。

Common body temperature sites provide invalid measures of body core temperature in hyperthermic humans wearing American football uniforms.

作者信息

Miller Kevin C, Adams William M

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation and Medical Sciences, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA.

Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.

出版信息

Temperature (Austin). 2020 Oct 15;8(2):166-175. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2020.1829940. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Valid body core temperature measurements are essential for diagnosing and monitoring athletes with exertional heat stroke (EHS). Experts question the validity of body temperature sites that vary by >±0.27°C from the gold standard, rectal temperature (T). No research has established the validity of body temperature sites when American football uniforms (PADS) are worn during simulated EHS scenarios. Thirteen men (age, 22 ± 2 y; mass, 77.5 ± 8.8 kg; height, 181.3 ± 5.7 cm) donned PADS and entered an environmental chamber (38.7 ± 0.8°C, 38.9 ± 2.4% relative humidity). We compared T to a forehead liquid crystal temperature monitor (T), axillary (T), oral (T), and aural temperatures (T) 34 times over four consecutive periods: 10-minutes of rest; exercise until participants T was between 39.7°C and 39.8°C; cold-water immersion (CWI, 10.0 ± 0.1°C) until all temperature sites indicated ≤38°C; and a 15-minute post-immersion recovery period. Body temperatures varied between sites during all periods (F ≥ 2.5, ≤ 0.001). T and T statistically differed from T and exceeded the 0.27°C bias threshold at all 34 measurement times (100%). T differed from T eight times during rest; eight times during exercise; 0 times during CWI; and twice during recovery (18/34, 53%). T exceeded the bias threshold 28 times (82%). T differed from T five times during rest; 0 times during exercise; five times during CWI; and once during recovery (11/34, 32%). T exceeded the 0.27°C bias threshold 15 times during testing (44%). T, T, T, and T should not be used to diagnose or monitor American football players with EHS. analysis of variance; CWI: cold water immersion; EHS: exertional heatstroke; PADS: full American football uniform consisting of a helmet; shoulder, knee, thigh, hip and tailbone pads; a jersey top; undergarments; and half-length pants; T: axillary temperature; T: aural temperature; T: liquid crystal temperature monitor; T: oral temperature; T: rectal temperature.

摘要

有效的体核温度测量对于诊断和监测患有劳力性热射病(EHS)的运动员至关重要。专家们质疑与金标准直肠温度(T)相差超过±0.27°C的体温测量部位的有效性。在模拟EHS场景中穿着美式橄榄球制服(护具)时,尚未有研究确定体温测量部位的有效性。13名男性(年龄,22±2岁;体重,77.5±8.8千克;身高,181.3±5.7厘米)穿上护具,进入环境舱(38.7±0.8°C,相对湿度38.9±2.4%)。我们在连续四个阶段对直肠温度(T)与前额液晶温度监测仪(T)、腋窝温度(T)、口腔温度(T)和耳温(T)进行了34次比较:10分钟休息;运动至参与者体温在39.7°C至39.8°C之间;冷水浸泡(CWI,10.0±0.1°C)直至所有体温测量部位显示≤38°C;以及浸泡后15分钟的恢复期。在所有阶段,各测量部位的体温均存在差异(F≥2.5,P≤0.001)。在所有34次测量时(100%),T和T与T在统计学上存在差异,且超过了0.27°C的偏差阈值。休息期间,T与T有8次不同;运动期间有8次不同;冷水浸泡期间为0次不同;恢复期有2次不同(18/34,53%)。T超过偏差阈值28次(82%)。休息期间,T与T有5次不同;运动期间为0次不同;冷水浸泡期间有5次不同;恢复期有1次不同(11/34,32%)。测试期间,T超过0.27°C偏差阈值15次(44%)。T、T、T和T不应用于诊断或监测患有EHS的美式橄榄球运动员。方差分析;CWI:冷水浸泡;EHS:劳力性热射病;PADS:包括头盔、肩部、膝盖、大腿、臀部和尾骨护垫、运动上衣、内衣和短裤的全套美式橄榄球制服;T:腋窝温度;T:耳温;T:液晶温度监测仪;T:口腔温度;T:直肠温度

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Heatstroke.中暑
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2449-2459. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1810762.
5
Consensus Statement- Prehospital Care of Exertional Heat Stroke.共识声明——劳力性热射病的院前急救
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 May-Jun;22(3):392-397. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1392666. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验