Frings Daniel, Melichar Lucinda, Albery Ian P
Division of Psychology, London South Bank University, United Kingdom.
Addict Behav Rep. 2016 Apr 16;3:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2016.04.002. eCollection 2016 Jun.
Having an identity as a 'drinker' has been linked to increased alcohol-related harm, self-reported consumption and self-reported intention to engage in risky drinking behavior. These effects have been observed when identities have been measured using explicit measures (e.g. via questionnaires) and implicitly (e.g. using Implicit Association Tests [IATs] adapted to measure identity). Little research has used actual behavioral measures to measure alcohol consumption in-the-moment, nor compared the effects of implicit and explicit identities directly.
Participants' ( = 40) implicit and explicit identities associated with being a drinker were measured. Attitudes towards one's own drinking were measured explicitly. Participants completed a Pouring Taste Preference Task [PTPT] involving the consumption and rating of non-alcoholic wine. This provided a behavioral measure of intention (pouring), a behavioral measure of consumption and a measure of the implementation of intention into behavior.
Results showed an interactive effect of implicit and explicit identities on attitudes and behavior. Explicit identities predicted attitudes towards drinking, but not behavior. Neither identity predicted the amount poured. Implicit identities predicted the amount consumed. A greater proportion of wine poured was predicted by higher implicit identities when explicit identities were absent.
These results suggest that explicit identities may be associated more with those beliefs about drinking that one is aware of than behavioral intention. In addition, explicit identities may not predict behavioral enactment well. Implicit identity shows effects on actual behavior and not behavioral intention. Together this highlights the differential influence of reflective (explicit) and impulsive (implicit) identity in-the-moment behavior.
拥有“饮酒者”身份与酒精相关危害增加、自我报告的饮酒量以及自我报告的从事危险饮酒行为的意图有关。当使用明确测量方法(例如通过问卷调查)和隐性测量方法(例如使用改编用于测量身份的内隐联想测验 [IAT])来测量身份时,已观察到这些影响。很少有研究使用实际行为测量方法来即时测量酒精摄入量,也没有直接比较隐性身份和显性身份的影响。
测量了参与者(n = 40)与饮酒者相关的隐性和显性身份。明确测量了对自己饮酒的态度。参与者完成了一项倾倒口味偏好任务 [PTPT],其中包括对无酒精葡萄酒的饮用和评分。这提供了意图的行为测量(倾倒)、饮酒量的行为测量以及意图转化为行为的测量。
结果显示隐性和显性身份对态度和行为有交互作用。显性身份预测了对饮酒的态度,但不能预测行为。两种身份都不能预测倾倒量。隐性身份预测了饮酒量。当不存在显性身份时,较高的隐性身份预测了更大比例的葡萄酒倾倒量。
这些结果表明,显性身份可能更多地与人们意识到的关于饮酒的信念相关,而不是行为意图。此外,显性身份可能不能很好地预测行为表现。隐性身份对实际行为有影响,而不是对行为意图有影响。这共同凸显了反思性(显性)身份和冲动性(隐性)身份在即时行为中的不同影响。