• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计一个以患者为中心的决策支持工具,用于选择器官移植中心。

Design of a patient-centered decision support tool when selecting an organ transplant center.

机构信息

College of Design, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.

Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 17;16(5):e0251102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251102. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0251102
PMID:33999964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8128227/
Abstract

Patients in the US in need of a life-saving organ transplant must complete a long process of medical decisions, and a first step is to identify a transplant center to complete an evaluation. This study describes a patient-centered process of testing and refinement of a new website (www.transplantcentersearch.org) that was developed to provide data to patients who are seeking a transplant center. Mixed methods, including online surveys and structured usability testing, were conducted to inform changes in an iterative process. Survey data from 684 participants indicated the effects of different icon styles on user decisions. Qualitative feedback from 38 usability testing participants informed improvements to the website interface. The mixed methods approach was feasible and well suited to the need to address multiple development steps of a patient-facing tool. The combined methods allowed for large survey sample sizes and also allowed interaction with a functioning website and in-depth qualitative discussions. The approach is applicable for a broad range of target user groups who are faced with challenging decisions and a need for information tailored to individual users. The survey and usability testing concluded with a functioning website that is positively received by users and meets the objective to support patient decisions when seeking an organ transplant.

摘要

美国的患者如需进行挽救生命的器官移植,必须完成一系列漫长的医疗决策过程,其中第一步是确定移植中心并完成评估。本研究描述了一个以患者为中心的测试和改进新网站(www.transplantcentersearch.org)的过程,该网站旨在为寻求移植中心的患者提供数据。采用混合方法,包括在线调查和结构化可用性测试,以迭代的方式提供信息,从而对网站进行更改。对 684 名参与者的调查数据表明,不同图标的样式对用户决策的影响。38 名可用性测试参与者的定性反馈为改进网站界面提供了信息。混合方法是可行的,非常适合满足患者为中心工具的多个开发步骤的需求。这种方法可以进行大规模的调查样本,也可以与功能齐全的网站进行交互,并进行深入的定性讨论。该方法适用于广泛的目标用户群体,这些用户面临着具有挑战性的决策,并且需要针对个体用户的信息。调查和可用性测试的结论是一个功能齐全的网站,受到用户的好评,并达到了在寻求器官移植时支持患者决策的目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c15/8128227/8c610cc4f11f/pone.0251102.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c15/8128227/4e70a3beac1a/pone.0251102.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c15/8128227/f6deec830dc2/pone.0251102.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c15/8128227/d12e29da75e2/pone.0251102.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c15/8128227/6afc0cc591eb/pone.0251102.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c15/8128227/8c610cc4f11f/pone.0251102.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c15/8128227/4e70a3beac1a/pone.0251102.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c15/8128227/f6deec830dc2/pone.0251102.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c15/8128227/d12e29da75e2/pone.0251102.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c15/8128227/6afc0cc591eb/pone.0251102.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c15/8128227/8c610cc4f11f/pone.0251102.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Design of a patient-centered decision support tool when selecting an organ transplant center.设计一个以患者为中心的决策支持工具,用于选择器官移植中心。
PLoS One. 2021 May 17;16(5):e0251102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251102. eCollection 2021.
2
Provider and Patient Perspectives on a New Tangible Decision Aid Tool to Support Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling with Adolescents and Young Adults.提供者和患者对一种新的有形决策辅助工具的看法,该工具用于支持以患者为中心的青少年和年轻成人避孕咨询。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021 Feb;34(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
Human-Centered Design Study: Enhancing the Usability of a Mobile Phone App in an Integrated Falls Risk Detection System for Use by Older Adult Users.以人为本的设计研究:提升一款用于老年人的综合跌倒风险检测系统中手机应用程序的可用性。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 30;5(5):e71. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7046.
4
Consumer participation in quality improvements for chronic disease care: development and evaluation of an interactive patient-centered survey to identify preferred service initiatives.消费者参与慢性病护理质量改进:开发并评估一项以患者为中心的交互式调查,以确定首选服务举措。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 19;16(12):e292. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3545.
5
Technology Experience of Solid Organ Transplant Patients and Their Overall Willingness to Use Interactive Health Technology.实体器官移植患者的技术体验及其对互动式健康技术的整体使用意愿。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Mar;50(2):151-162. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12362. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
6
User-Centered Design and Evaluation of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Older Adults Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Health Care Providers: Mixed Methods Study.基于用户为中心的设计和评估:一个适用于轻度认知障碍老年人及其医护人员的基于网络的决策辅助工具:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 19;22(8):e17406. doi: 10.2196/17406.
7
Developing a Decision Aid to Facilitate Informed Decision Making About Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Lung Transplantation Among Adults With Cystic Fibrosis: Usability Testing.开发一种决策辅助工具,以促进囊性纤维化成年患者在有创机械通气和肺移植方面做出明智的决策:可用性测试
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Apr 14;8(2):e21270. doi: 10.2196/21270.
8
Designing an over-the-counter consumer decision-making tool for older adults.为老年人设计一种非处方消费者决策工具。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Oct;57:113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
9
User-centered design and usability testing of an innovative health-related quality of life module.以用户为中心的创新型健康相关生活质量模块的设计与可用性测试。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Dec 10;5(4):958-70. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-08-RA-0067. eCollection 2014.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of a Web-Based Patient Decision Aid for Therapeutic Options for Sickle Cell Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的镰状细胞病治疗方案患者决策辅助工具的比较效果:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 4;21(12):e14462. doi: 10.2196/14462.

引用本文的文献

1
A narrative review on the psychosocial domains of the impact of organ transplantation.关于器官移植影响的社会心理领域的叙述性综述。
Discov Ment Health. 2025 Feb 24;5(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00148-y.
2
Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a New Tool to Support Patient Decision-making on Transplant Centers.评估一种支持患者选择移植中心的新工具的随机对照试验。
Clin Transplant. 2024 Dec;38(12):e70043. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70043.

本文引用的文献

1
Uncertainty in organ allocation is a catalyst for positive change.器官分配中的不确定性是积极变革的催化剂。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jun;21(6):1996-1997. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16511. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Innovating health care: key characteristics of human-centered design.创新医疗保健:以人为本设计的关键特征。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jan 12;33(Supplement_1):37-44. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa127.
3
Development of a Patient-specific Search of Transplant Program Outcomes and Characteristics: Feedback From Kidney Transplant Patients.
患者特异性移植项目结果与特征搜索的开发:来自肾移植患者的反馈
Transplant Direct. 2020 Jul 17;6(8):e585. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001036. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Tool to Aid Patients in Selecting a Liver Transplant Center.辅助患者选择肝移植中心的工具。
Liver Transpl. 2020 Mar;26(3):337-348. doi: 10.1002/lt.25715.
5
Comparing Pretransplant and Posttransplant Outcomes When Choosing a Transplant Center: Focus Groups and a Randomized Survey.比较移植中心选择时的移植前和移植后结果:焦点小组和随机调查。
Transplantation. 2020 Jan;104(1):201-210. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002809.
6
How patients choose kidney transplant centers: A qualitative study of patient experiences.患者如何选择肾移植中心:一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Transplant. 2019 May;33(5):e13523. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13523. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
7
Design Thinking in Health Care.医疗保健中的设计思维。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Sep 27;15:E117. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.180128.
8
Seeking new answers to old questions about public reporting of transplant program performance in the United States.探寻美国移植项目绩效公众报告中旧问题的新答案。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19(2):317-323. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15051. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
9
Association of pretransplant and posttransplant program ratings with candidate mortality after listing.移植前和移植后项目评分与候选者列名后的死亡率的相关性。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19(2):399-406. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15032. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
10
Differential association of body mass index with access to kidney transplantation in men and women.体重指数与男性和女性肾移植可及性的差异关联。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 May;9(5):951-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08310813. Epub 2014 Apr 17.