• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a New Tool to Support Patient Decision-making on Transplant Centers.评估一种支持患者选择移植中心的新工具的随机对照试验。
Clin Transplant. 2024 Dec;38(12):e70043. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70043.
2
Dramatic secular changes in prognosis for kidney transplant candidates in the United States.美国肾移植候选人预后的显著长期变化。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19(2):414-424. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15021. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
3
Association Between Declined Offers of Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Candidates.接受或拒绝已故供体肾移植与肾移植候选人结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910312. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10312.
4
What patients and members of their support networks ask about transplant program data.患者及其支持网络成员对移植项目数据的询问内容。
Clin Transplant. 2017 Dec;31(12). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13125. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
5
Designing a patient-specific search of transplant program performance and outcomes: Feedback from heart transplant candidates and recipients.设计针对移植项目表现和结果的个体化搜索:来自心脏移植候选人和受者的反馈。
Clin Transplant. 2021 Feb;35(2):e14183. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14183. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
6
Association of pretransplant and posttransplant program ratings with candidate mortality after listing.移植前和移植后项目评分与候选者列名后的死亡率的相关性。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19(2):399-406. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15032. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
7
Patients prioritize waitlist over posttransplant outcomes when evaluating kidney transplant centers.当评估肾移植中心时,患者更看重候补名单而不是移植后的结果。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov;18(11):2781-2790. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14985. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
8
Influence of the procurement surgeon on transplanted abdominal organ outcomes: An SRTR analysis to evaluate regional organ procurement collaboration.采购外科医生对移植腹部器官结局的影响:一项评估区域器官获取合作的 SRTR 分析。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Aug;19(8):2219-2231. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15301. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
Kidney offer acceptance at programs undergoing a Systems Improvement Agreement.接受肾脏捐献的项目正在进行系统改进协议。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Sep;18(9):2182-2188. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14907. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

本文引用的文献

1
OPTN/SRTR 2022 Annual Data Report: Kidney.OPTN/SRTR 2022 年度数据报告:肾脏。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Feb;24(2S1):S19-S118. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.01.012.
2
Stakeholders' perspectives on transplant metrics: the 2022 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients' consensus conference.利益相关者对移植指标的看法:2022 年移植受者科学注册处共识会议。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Jul;23(7):875-890. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.03.012. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
3
Design of a patient-centered decision support tool when selecting an organ transplant center.设计一个以患者为中心的决策支持工具,用于选择器官移植中心。
PLoS One. 2021 May 17;16(5):e0251102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251102. eCollection 2021.
4
Designing a patient-specific search of transplant program performance and outcomes: Feedback from heart transplant candidates and recipients.设计针对移植项目表现和结果的个体化搜索:来自心脏移植候选人和受者的反馈。
Clin Transplant. 2021 Feb;35(2):e14183. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14183. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
5
Development of a Patient-specific Search of Transplant Program Outcomes and Characteristics: Feedback From Kidney Transplant Patients.患者特异性移植项目结果与特征搜索的开发:来自肾移植患者的反馈
Transplant Direct. 2020 Jul 17;6(8):e585. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001036. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Tool to Aid Patients in Selecting a Liver Transplant Center.辅助患者选择肝移植中心的工具。
Liver Transpl. 2020 Mar;26(3):337-348. doi: 10.1002/lt.25715.
7
Comparing Pretransplant and Posttransplant Outcomes When Choosing a Transplant Center: Focus Groups and a Randomized Survey.比较移植中心选择时的移植前和移植后结果:焦点小组和随机调查。
Transplantation. 2020 Jan;104(1):201-210. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002809.
8
How patients choose kidney transplant centers: A qualitative study of patient experiences.患者如何选择肾移植中心:一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Transplant. 2019 May;33(5):e13523. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13523. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
9
A comparative analysis of survival of patients on dialysis and after kidney transplantation.透析患者与肾移植患者生存率的比较分析。
Clin Kidney J. 2018 Jun;11(3):389-393. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx117. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
10
What patients and members of their support networks ask about transplant program data.患者及其支持网络成员对移植项目数据的询问内容。
Clin Transplant. 2017 Dec;31(12). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13125. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

评估一种支持患者选择移植中心的新工具的随机对照试验。

Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a New Tool to Support Patient Decision-making on Transplant Centers.

作者信息

McKinney Warren T, Israni Kareena, Schaffhausen Cory R, Schladt David P, Lyden Grace R, Matas Arthur, Wolf Jack, Japuntich Sandra, Israni Ajay K

机构信息

Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Division of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2024 Dec;38(12):e70043. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70043.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.70043
PMID:39620865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11684661/
Abstract

Patients are not always aware of listing criteria and offer acceptance across transplant programs. Factors such as age and body mass index can impact access to transplants as centers have different candidate criteria. Therefore, we created a transplant center search tool (transplantcentersearch.org) (TCST) to help patients find comparative information on transplant programs. We conducted a cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether the TCST improved comprehension compared to the existing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients website among adults seeking kidney transplants at two centers. To assess comprehension participants were asked to use the TCST and the SRTR website to identify which transplant program within a prespecified area had the most recipients over 70 years of age; and which programs had the most recipients with BMI >40. Participants were asked to provide qualitative feedback on using both websites. Sixty-eight candidates participated in the RCT. Participants were more likely to identify the correct program when using the TCST compared to the existing SRTR website (OR 8.13, 95% CI 1.87-35.33). Participants stated they preferred the TCST over the SRTR website (52.9% vs. 25.0%, respectively, p = 0.009). With increased comprehension, patients would be better equipped to identify programs that transplant patients like them. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03610555.

摘要

患者并不总是了解各移植项目的列入标准和接受情况。年龄和体重指数等因素会影响移植机会,因为不同的移植中心有不同的候选标准。因此,我们创建了一个移植中心搜索工具(transplantcentersearch.org)(TCST),以帮助患者查找有关移植项目的比较信息。我们进行了一项交叉随机对照试验(RCT),以评估与现有的移植受者科学登记网站相比,TCST是否能提高在两个中心寻求肾移植的成年人的理解能力。为了评估理解能力,我们要求参与者使用TCST和SRTR网站,确定在一个预先指定的区域内,哪个移植项目的70岁以上受者最多;以及哪个项目的体重指数>40的受者最多。我们要求参与者对使用这两个网站提供定性反馈。68名候选人参与了RCT。与现有的SRTR网站相比,参与者使用TCST时更有可能识别出正确的项目(优势比8.13,95%置信区间1.87 - 35.33)。参与者表示,他们更喜欢TCST而不是SRTR网站(分别为52.9%对25.0%,p = 0.009)。随着理解能力的提高,患者将更有能力识别适合像他们这样的患者进行移植的项目。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03610555。