Janssen Research & Development, LLC., Neuroimmunology Drug Discovery, 3210 Merryfield Row, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC., NonClinical Safety, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sci Rep. 2021 May 17;11(1):10447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89777-1.
Microglia, CNS resident innate immune cells, respond strongly to activation of TLR3 and TLR4, which recognize viral dsRNA poly(I:C) and bacterial endotoxin LPS, respectively. However, few studies have thoroughly and parallelly compared functional phenotypes and downstream mechanisms between LPS- and poly(I:C)-exposed primary microglia. Here, we investigated the responses of mouse primary microglia upon LPS and poly(I:C) stimulation by detecting various phenotypes ranging from morphology, proliferation, secretion, chemotaxis, to phagocytosis. Furthermore, we explored their sequential gene expression and the downstream signal cascades. Interestingly, we found that the microglial activation pattern induced by LPS was distinguished from that induced by poly(I:C). Regarding microglial morphology, LPS caused an ameboid-like shape while poly(I:C) induced a bushy shape. Microglial proliferation was also facilitated by LPS but not by poly(I:C). In addition, LPS and poly(I:C) modulated microglial chemotaxis and phagocytosis differently. Furthermore, genome-wide analysis provided gene-level support to these functional differences, which may be associated with NF-κb and type I interferon pathways. Last, LPS- and poly(I:C)-activated microglia mediated neurotoxicity in a co-culture system. This study extends our understanding of TLR roles in microglia and provides insights into selecting proper inflammatory microglial models, which may facilitate identification of new targets for therapeutic application.
小胶质细胞是中枢神经系统固有免疫细胞,对 TLR3 和 TLR4 的激活反应强烈,TLR3 和 TLR4 分别识别病毒双链 RNA 多聚(I:C)和细菌内毒素 LPS。然而,很少有研究全面且平行地比较 LPS 和 poly(I:C)暴露的原代小胶质细胞之间的功能表型和下游机制。在这里,我们通过检测从形态、增殖、分泌、趋化性到吞噬作用等各种表型,研究了 LPS 和 poly(I:C)刺激小鼠原代小胶质细胞的反应。此外,我们还探讨了它们的顺序基因表达和下游信号级联。有趣的是,我们发现 LPS 诱导的小胶质细胞激活模式与 poly(I:C)诱导的激活模式不同。就小胶质细胞形态而言,LPS 引起阿米巴样形状,而 poly(I:C)诱导树突状形状。LPS 促进小胶质细胞增殖,但 poly(I:C)则不然。此外,LPS 和 poly(I:C)对小胶质细胞趋化性和吞噬作用的调节方式也不同。此外,全基因组分析为这些功能差异提供了基因水平的支持,这可能与 NF-κB 和 I 型干扰素途径有关。最后,LPS 和 poly(I:C)激活的小胶质细胞在共培养系统中介导神经毒性。这项研究扩展了我们对 TLR 在小胶质细胞中的作用的理解,并为选择合适的炎症小胶质细胞模型提供了思路,这可能有助于确定治疗应用的新靶点。