• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与水相关的生态基础设施投资对支持可持续土地利用的益处:对南非严重缺水集水区的证据综述

Benefits of water-related ecological infrastructure investments to support sustainable land-use: a review of evidence from critically water-stressed catchments in South Africa.

作者信息

Rebelo Alanna J, Holden Petra B, Esler Karen, New Mark G

机构信息

Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.

African Climate and Development Initiative, University of Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Apr 28;8(4):201402. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201402.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.201402
PMID:34007458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8080003/
Abstract

Investments to promote sustainable land-use within critical river catchment areas are often undertaken to provide benefits to society. Investments generally aim to protect or restore ecological infrastructure-the underlying framework of ecosystems, functions and processes that supply ecosystem services-for multiple benefits to society. However, the empirical evidence base from studies across the world on both mechanisms and outcomes to support these assumptions is limited. We collate evidence on the benefits of ecological infrastructure interventions, in terms of ecosystem services provided to society, from three major South African water-providing catchments using a novel framework. In these catchments, millions of US Dollars' worth of investments have been made into ecological infrastructure since 1996. We ask the question: is there evidence that ecological infrastructure interventions are delivering the proposed benefits? Results show that even in catchments with substantial, long-term financial investment into ecological infrastructure, research has not empirically confirmed the benefits. Better baseline data collection is required, and monitoring during and after ecological infrastructure interventions, to quantify benefits to society. This evidence is needed to leverage investment into ecological infrastructure interventions at scale. Investment at scale is needed to transition to more sustainable land-use to unlock greater benefits to nature and people.

摘要

在关键河流集水区内促进可持续土地利用的投资通常是为了给社会带来益处。投资一般旨在保护或恢复生态基础设施——即提供生态系统服务的生态系统、功能及过程的基础框架——以实现对社会的多重效益。然而,全球范围内关于支持这些假设的机制和结果的实证证据基础有限。我们使用一个新颖的框架,整理了来自南非三个主要供水集水区的、关于生态基础设施干预措施在为社会提供生态系统服务方面所带来益处的证据。自1996年以来,在这些集水区已对生态基础设施投入了价值数百万美元的资金。我们提出一个问题:是否有证据表明生态基础设施干预措施正在带来预期的效益?结果表明,即便在对生态基础设施进行了大量长期资金投入的集水区,研究也尚未从实证上证实这些效益。需要更好地收集基线数据,并在生态基础设施干预期间及之后进行监测,以量化对社会的效益。要大规模撬动对生态基础设施干预措施的投资,就需要这些证据。要向更可持续的土地利用转型以释放对自然和人类的更大效益,则需要大规模投资。

相似文献

1
Benefits of water-related ecological infrastructure investments to support sustainable land-use: a review of evidence from critically water-stressed catchments in South Africa.与水相关的生态基础设施投资对支持可持续土地利用的益处:对南非严重缺水集水区的证据综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Apr 28;8(4):201402. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201402.
2
Investing in sustainable catchments.投资可持续集水区。
Sci Total Environ. 2004 May 25;324(1-3):1-24. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.10.019.
3
Assessing Ecological Infrastructure Investments-A Case Study of Water Rights Trading in Lu'an City, Anhui Province, China.评估生态基础设施投资——以中国安徽省六安市水权交易为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 20;19(4):2443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042443.
4
Safeguarding the provision of ecosystem services in catchment systems.保护集水区系统中生态系统服务的提供。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2013 Apr;9(2):252-9. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1386. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
5
Assessing ecological infrastructure investments.评估生态基础设施投资。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5254-5261. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802883116. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
6
Tuberculosis结核病
7
Typologies of collaborative governance for scaling nature-based solutions in two strategic South African river systems.两种战略性南非河流系统中基于自然的解决方案规模化的协作治理类型学。
Ambio. 2021 Aug;50(8):1587-1609. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01531-z. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
8
An impact assessment tool to identify, quantify and select optimal social-economic, ecological and health outcomes of civic environmental management interventions, in Durban South Africa.用于识别、量化和选择南非德班市公民环境管理干预措施的最佳社会经济、生态和健康结果的影响评估工具。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 15;302(Pt A):113966. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113966. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
9
Valuing the benefits of creek rehabilitation: building a business case for public investments in urban green infrastructure.评估小溪修复的效益:为城市绿色基础设施的公共投资建立商业案例。
Environ Manage. 2015 Jun;55(6):1354-65. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0471-7. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
Nature-based solutions for improving navigation reliability on the Madeira River, Brazil.基于自然的解决方案提高巴西马德拉河的航行可靠性。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2022 Jan;18(1):115-122. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4478. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Guiding restoration of riparian ecosystems degraded by plant invasions: Insights from a complex social-ecological system in the Global South.指导受植物入侵影响的河岸生态系统恢复:来自南方国家复杂社会-生态系统的启示。
Ambio. 2022 Jun;51(6):1552-1568. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01691-y. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
To Model or not to Model, That is no Longer the Question for Ecologists.建模与否,这已不再是生态学家们面临的问题。
Ecosystems. 2017 Mar;20(2):222-228. doi: 10.1007/s10021-016-0068-x.
2
Restoration enhances wetland biodiversity and ecosystem service supply, but results are context-dependent: a meta-analysis.湿地恢复可增强生物多样性并提供生态系统服务,但结果因具体情况而异:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 17;9(4):e93507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093507. eCollection 2014.
3
Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis.
生态恢复对生物多样性和生态系统服务的增强作用:一项荟萃分析。
Science. 2009 Aug 28;325(5944):1121-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1172460. Epub 2009 Jul 30.