Hines M W, Jost B F, Fogelman K L
Texas Retina Associates, Dallas 75231.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1988 Aug 15;106(2):174-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90830-6.
We performed 84 intraocular pressure measurements with the Oculab Tono-Pen, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and pneumatic tonometer in 47 eyes that had undergone pars plana vitrectomy and gas-fluid exchange. Measurements made by using the Tono-Pen were accurate when compared to those made by Goldmann tonometry (mean difference, 0.74 mm Hg). In a subset of eyes with increased intraocular pressure (greater than or equal to 25 mm Hg), the Tono-Pen provided measurements similar to those made by Goldmann applanation tonometry (P greater than .60), with only three of 39 readings (8%) underestimating the Goldmann pressure by more than 3 mm Hg. Pneumatic tonometry significantly underestimated the intraocular pressure in eyes with increased pressure (P less than .001), with 20 of 39 readings (51%) underestimating the Goldmann pressure by 5 mm Hg or more.
我们使用Oculab眼压笔、Goldmann压平眼压计和气动眼压计对47只接受了睫状体平坦部玻璃体切除术和气液交换的眼睛进行了84次眼压测量。与Goldmann眼压测量法相比,使用眼压笔进行的测量是准确的(平均差值为0.74毫米汞柱)。在眼压升高(大于或等于25毫米汞柱)的一部分眼睛中,眼压笔提供的测量结果与Goldmann压平眼压测量法相似(P大于0.60),39次读数中只有3次(8%)低估Goldmann眼压超过3毫米汞柱。气动眼压测量法在眼压升高的眼睛中显著低估了眼压(P小于0.001),39次读数中有20次(51%)低估Goldmann眼压5毫米汞柱或更多。