Midelfart A, Wigers A
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Trondheim, University Hospital, Norway.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Dec;78(12):895-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.12.895.
A clinical evaluation of a new electron ProTon tonometer was performed comparing the values of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured using this instrument with those determined by a similar instrument, Tono-Pen XL, and by Goldmann applanation tonometry. The mean IOP measured in 106 eyes with the ProTon tonometer was not significantly different from that determined with Goldmann applanation, while the IOP values measured with Tono-Pen XL were significantly lower. The 95% limits of agreement between applanation tonometry and ProTon tonometry were between -4 mm Hg and 5 mm Hg and between applanation tonometry and Tono-Pen XL tonometry between -3 mm Hg and 8 mm Hg. The ProTon tonometer appears to have a higher level of accuracy than the Tono-Pen XL tonometer in clinical practice.
对一种新型电子质子眼压计进行了临床评估,将使用该仪器测量的眼压(IOP)值与通过类似仪器Tono-Pen XL以及Goldmann压平眼压测量法所测定的值进行比较。用ProTon眼压计在106只眼中测量的平均眼压与Goldmann压平眼压测量法所测定的平均眼压无显著差异,而用Tono-Pen XL测量的眼压值明显更低。压平眼压测量法与ProTon眼压测量法之间的95%一致性界限在-4 mmHg至5 mmHg之间,压平眼压测量法与Tono-Pen XL眼压测量法之间的95%一致性界限在-3 mmHg至8 mmHg之间。在临床实践中,ProTon眼压计似乎比Tono-Pen XL眼压计具有更高的准确性水平。