Moons Philip, Goossens Eva, Thompson David R
KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021 Jun 29;20(5):515-519. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab041.
Although systematic reviews are the method of choice to synthesize scientific evidence, they can take years to complete and publish. Clinicians, managers, and policy-makers often need input from scientific evidence in a more timely and resource-efficient manner. For this purpose, rapid reviews are conducted. Rapid reviews are performed using an accelerated process. However, they should not be less systematic than standard systematic reviews, and the introduction of bias must be avoided. In this article, we describe what rapid reviews are, present their characteristics, give some examples, highlight potential pitfalls, and draw attention to the importance of evidence summaries in order to facilitate adoption in clinical decision-making.
尽管系统评价是综合科学证据的首选方法，但完成并发表可能需要数年时间。临床医生、管理人员和政策制定者通常需要以更及时且资源高效的方式获取科学证据。为此，开展了快速评价。快速评价采用加速流程进行。然而，其系统性不应低于标准系统评价，且必须避免引入偏倚。在本文中，我们描述了快速评价是什么，介绍了其特点，给出了一些示例，强调了潜在的陷阱，并提请注意证据总结在促进临床决策应用方面的重要性。
