• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估身体活动偏好的离散选择实验:属性及其水平的混合方法研究

Discrete Choice Experiment in Evaluating Preferences for Physical Activity: A Mixed-Methods Study of Attributes and Their Levels.

作者信息

Veisi Mohammad, Daroudi Rajabali, Kordi Ramin, Akbari Sari Ali

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Sports Medicine Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Oct 29;38:125. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.125. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.125
PMID:39968477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11835406/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discrete choice experiment (DCE) has become a leading method for evaluating health sector preferences. Despite its common use in evaluating physical activity (PA) preference, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal attribute and level, and this step often lacks rigorous documentation. This study aimed to identify suitable attributes and levels for a PA program for future application in DCE studies.

METHODS

This study used a mixed-method approach. Initially, a rapid review was performed using databases and search engines. The findings were then used for a 2-stage semi-structured interview for attribute addition and scoring. Finally, top-scoring attributes were selected, and a small expert panel determined their associated levels.

RESULTS

In our rapid review, from 8144 titles according to search strategy, 10 were selected for data extraction. After content analysis and integration of similar attributes, 12 were identified and 4 more were added from interviews. Using the opinions of the expert panel, the top 5 attributes were selected and a total of 22 levels were determined for these 5 attributes. The selected attributes included monthly cost, companions, distance, PA time, and PA type, with total scores of 150, 149, 147, 144, and 123, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified 5 attributes and 22 corresponding levels as effective tools for measuring PA preferences using a DCE approach. As this is a pioneering study, further comprehensive research is recommended for improved outcomes.

摘要

背景

离散选择实验(DCE)已成为评估卫生部门偏好的主要方法。尽管它在评估身体活动(PA)偏好方面被广泛使用,但在最佳属性和水平上缺乏共识,并且这一步骤往往缺乏严格的记录。本研究旨在确定适用于PA项目的属性和水平,以供未来在DCE研究中应用。

方法

本研究采用混合方法。首先,使用数据库和搜索引擎进行快速综述。然后将研究结果用于两阶段半结构化访谈,以添加属性并进行评分。最后,选择得分最高的属性,并由一个小型专家小组确定其相关水平。

结果

在我们的快速综述中,根据搜索策略从8144个标题中选择了10个进行数据提取。经过内容分析和对相似属性的整合,确定了12个属性,并从访谈中又添加了4个。根据专家小组的意见,选择了前5个属性,并为这5个属性确定了总共22个水平。所选属性包括每月成本、同伴、距离、PA时间和PA类型,总分分别为150、149、147、144和123。

结论

我们的研究确定了5个属性和22个相应水平,作为使用DCE方法测量PA偏好的有效工具。由于这是一项开创性研究,建议进行进一步的综合研究以改善结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c49/11835406/b960db44c2d5/mjiri-38-125-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c49/11835406/6c8df342c533/mjiri-38-125-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c49/11835406/b960db44c2d5/mjiri-38-125-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c49/11835406/6c8df342c533/mjiri-38-125-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c49/11835406/b960db44c2d5/mjiri-38-125-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Discrete Choice Experiment in Evaluating Preferences for Physical Activity: A Mixed-Methods Study of Attributes and Their Levels.评估身体活动偏好的离散选择实验:属性及其水平的混合方法研究
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Oct 29;38:125. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.125. eCollection 2024.
2
Attributes development for a discrete choice experiment on preferences in sexual and reproductive health services for adolescents and young people in Nigeria.属性发展用于在尼日利亚青少年和年轻人的性和生殖健康服务偏好的离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):1511. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08888-1.
3
Development of attributes and attribute levels for a discrete choice experiment on patients' and providers' choice for antiretroviral therapy service in Northwest Ethiopia.开发属性和属性水平离散选择实验对患者和提供者的选择抗逆转录病毒治疗服务在埃塞俄比亚西北部。
AIDS Res Ther. 2023 Jun 4;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12981-023-00531-1.
4
Developing attributes and attribute-levels for a discrete choice experiment on micro health insurance in rural Malawi.为马拉维农村地区的小额健康保险离散选择实验开发属性和属性水平。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 22;14:235. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-235.
5
A qualitative study to identify critical attributes and attribute-levels for a discrete choice experiment on oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery among young people in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa.一项定性研究,旨在确定南非开普敦和约翰内斯堡年轻人中口服暴露前预防(PrEP)提供的离散选择实验的关键属性和属性水平。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05942-8.
6
DCE attribute development investigating public policy for the provision of medicinal cannabis.探索药用大麻供应的公共政策的 DCE 属性开发。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):1232-1244. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2405288. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
7
A discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences for a liver screening programme in Queensland, Australia: a mixed methods study to select attributes and levels.采用离散选择实验方法在澳大利亚昆士兰州获取人们对肝脏筛查项目的偏好:一项选择属性和水平的混合方法研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 5;23(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09934-2.
8
Preferences of continuous care service options for patients with venous leg ulcer development of attributes for discrete choice experiments.下肢静脉溃疡患者对连续护理服务选项的偏好:离散选择实验属性的开发
Vascular. 2024 Dec 16:17085381241307911. doi: 10.1177/17085381241307911.
9
Qualitative Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment for Physical Activity Interventions to Improve Knee Osteoarthritis.用于改善膝关节骨关节炎的身体活动干预离散选择实验的定性发展
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;98(6):1210-1216.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
10
Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.患者对初级卫生保健的偏好——离散选择实验的系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7.

本文引用的文献

1
What Can Discrete-Choice Experiments Tell Us about Patient Preferences? An Introduction to Quantitative Analysis of Choice Data.离散选择实验能告诉我们哪些关于患者偏好的信息?选择数据定量分析简介。
Patient. 2024 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00705-7.
2
Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness.Cochrane有效性快速综述方法指南的更新建议。
BMJ. 2024 Feb 6;384:e076335. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076335.
3
How well did the consensus methods apply in the guideline development of traditional Chinese medicine: a web-based survey in China.
共识方法在中国中医药指南制定中的应用效果如何:一项基于网络的调查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02087-0.
4
Preferences of women in difficult life situations for a physical activity programme: protocol of a discrete choice experiment in the German NU-BIG project.困难生活情境下的女性对身体活动项目的偏好:德国 NU-BIG 项目中离散选择实验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 17;13(7):e067235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067235.
5
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends.离散选择实验在健康状态估值中的应用:进展与新趋势的系统综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):405-418. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00794-9. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
6
Consumer choices with variations in item price, delay, and opportunity cost.消费者在商品价格、延迟和机会成本变化情况下的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2023 Jan;119(1):25-35. doi: 10.1002/jeab.806. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
7
Preferences of people with mild cognitive impairment for physical activity interventions in China: protocol for a discrete choice experiment study.轻度认知障碍患者对中国身体活动干预措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 14;12(10):e064153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064153.
8
Enjoyment as a Predictor of Exercise Habit, Intention to Continue Exercising, and Exercise Frequency: The Intensity Traits Discrepancy Moderation Role.享受作为运动习惯、继续运动意图和运动频率的预测因素:强度特质差异的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 18;13:780059. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.780059. eCollection 2022.
9
Living with severe obesity: adults' physical activity preferences, self-efficacy to overcome barriers and motives.患有严重肥胖症:成年人的身体活动偏好、克服障碍的自我效能感和动机。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Feb;44(4):590-599. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1773944. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
10
Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies.支付意愿影响因素的研究:基于条件价值评估法的系统综述
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Dec;23(9):1455-1482. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01437-x. Epub 2022 Feb 15.