Suppr超能文献

印度药品说明书的信息充分性:一项批判性评估。

Information adequacy of medicine package inserts in India: A critical evaluation.

作者信息

Barkondaj Bikramjit, Mukhopadhyay Kaushik, Das Suvajit, Chatterjee Chandan, Mukherjee Sonali, Hazra Avijit

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, ESIC Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Department of Pharmacology, Rampurhat Government Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

Perspect Clin Res. 2021 Apr-Jun;12(2):87-92. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_177_18. Epub 2020 May 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Package inserts (PIs) are used by physicians and other health-care providers as ready source of approved prescribing information. In India, they are subject to statutory regulations that specify the information to be provided under various headings. Uniformity of PIs with optimal level of information is desirable, the absence of which may lead to medication errors. This observational study aimed to evaluate the information adequacy and accuracy of PIs available in the Indian market.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PIs of drugs marketed in India, and approved by United States Food and Drug Administration, were collected from various retail pharmacies through purposive sampling. The adequacy and accuracy of the information in each PI were evaluated with the help of a 25-item checklist prepared as per stipulations mentioned in statutory guidelines. Each required item of information was scored 1 if present and appropriate or 0 if absent or deemed incomplete or inaccurate. A total information adequacy score (IAS), with maximum value 25, was thereby calculated.

RESULTS

From the total 135 PIs analyzed, the median IAS was 17 (interquartile range 15-19). Deficiencies were observed under important headings. For example, "references" were mentioned in only 6.67% and "date of last updating" in only 19.26% of PIs. Other notable shortcomings were in "disposal" (not mentioned in 92.59%), "effects on ability to drive and use machines" (76.30%), "pharmaceutical incompatibilities" (66.67%), "shelf life" (62.96%), "excipients" (60.00%), and "overdose" (17.78%) information. Information on "generic name," "composition," and "indications" were however provided by all (100%) PIs.

CONCLUSIONS

The information provided by PIs in India being inadequate, may not be able to serve as a reliable source of information.

摘要

目的

药品说明书(PIs)被医生和其他医疗保健提供者用作已批准处方信息的现成来源。在印度,它们受法定法规约束,这些法规规定了在各个标题下应提供的信息。理想的情况是药品说明书具有最佳信息水平的一致性,否则可能会导致用药错误。这项观察性研究旨在评估印度市场上药品说明书的信息充分性和准确性。

材料与方法

通过立意抽样从各零售药店收集在印度销售且经美国食品药品监督管理局批准的药品的说明书。借助根据法定指南规定编制的一份包含25项条目的清单,对每份药品说明书中的信息充分性和准确性进行评估。如果每个所需信息项存在且合适,则得1分;如果不存在、被认为不完整或不准确,则得0分。由此计算出总信息充分性得分(IAS),最大值为25分。

结果

在总共分析的135份药品说明书中,IAS的中位数为17(四分位间距为15 - 19)。在重要标题下发现了不足之处。例如,只有6.67%的药品说明书提到了“参考文献”,只有19.26%提到了“上次更新日期”。其他明显的不足在于“处置”(92.59%未提及)、“对驾驶和操作机器能力的影响”(76.30%)、“药物不相容性”(66.67%)、“保质期”(62.96%)、“辅料”(60.00%)和“过量用药”(17.78%)信息。然而,所有(100%)药品说明书都提供了“通用名”“成分”和“适应症 ”信息。

结论

印度药品说明书提供的信息不充分,可能无法作为可靠的信息来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c72b/8112326/ba742e17db5a/PCR-12-87-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验