Mahaveerachartkul Korkiat, Sooraksa Nanta
Behavioral Science Research Institute, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand.
Graduate School of Human Resource Development, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, 10240, Thailand.
Heliyon. 2021 May 3;7(5):e06890. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06890. eCollection 2021 May.
Although common work conditions cannot be clearly classified as positive or negative, previous challenge-hindrance demands scales have failed to address this issue.
The purpose of this study was to develop and validate scales that allow the assessment of perceived levels of challenge-hindrance demands in the nursing profession and that are in conformance with the nature of the construct.
The study employed an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, composed of two phases. Firstly, the qualitative method was employed to find out the common work environment that is typically linked to the job demands of nurses; new scales were generated following the results. Secondly, the quantitative method was employed to refine and assess the validity and reliability of the instruments.
The key informants for the interview were 11 registered nurses from seven private hospitals in Bangkok, Thailand. In addition, the sample of the quantitative study, consisting of 761 Thai nurses from 16 private hospitals in Bangkok was randomly divided into three parts for different analyses (i.e., exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor and reliability analysis, and nomological validity analysis).
The findings demonstrated that the assessment of the challenge-hindrance demands consists of three parts: The amount of experience with stressors, the appraisal of challenges, and the appraisal of obstacles. The analyses led to the creation of two scales: the challenge demands scale and the hindrance demands scale, each with 14 variables and four dimensions.
The separation of the scales into three parts made it evident that, since job demands themselves are part of an inevitably stressful work environment, hospitals have to focus on the individual interpretation of each job demand in order to manage the burnout and engagement of nurses. In addition, the scales have potential use in studies relevant to problems encountered in the nursing profession (e.g., opting to pursue a different career).
尽管常见的工作条件不能明确归类为积极或消极,但以往的挑战-阻碍需求量表未能解决这一问题。
本研究的目的是开发并验证能够评估护理行业中感知到的挑战-阻碍需求水平且符合该结构性质的量表。
本研究采用探索性序列混合方法设计,由两个阶段组成。首先,采用定性方法找出通常与护士工作需求相关的常见工作环境;根据结果生成新的量表。其次,采用定量方法对工具进行完善,并评估其有效性和可靠性。
访谈的关键信息提供者是来自泰国曼谷七家私立医院的11名注册护士。此外,定量研究的样本由来自曼谷16家私立医院的761名泰国护士组成,随机分为三个部分进行不同分析(即探索性因素分析、验证性因素和可靠性分析以及效标效度分析)。
研究结果表明,挑战-阻碍需求的评估包括三个部分:压力源的经历量、对挑战的评价以及对障碍的评价。分析得出了两个量表:挑战需求量表和阻碍需求量表,每个量表都有14个变量和四个维度。
将量表分为三个部分表明,由于工作需求本身是不可避免的压力工作环境的一部分,医院必须关注对每个工作需求的个体解读,以管理护士的倦怠和敬业度。此外,这些量表在与护理行业中遇到的问题相关的研究(例如选择追求不同职业)中具有潜在用途。