Adibe Chiche, Craigmile Peter F, Onnen Nathaniel, Schwartz Elli, Roberts Megan E
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ohio J Public Health. 2019 Jun;2(1):12-18.
Studies from various parts of the country suggest that tobacco-related health disparities are exacerbated by disparities in the distribution of tobacco retailers (convenience stores, tobacco shops, etc.). The purpose of the present study was to use advanced spatial modeling techniques for count data to estimate current disparities in tobacco retailer density in Ohio.
We identified and geocoded 11,392 tobacco retailers in Ohio. Next, we obtained census tract-level information on race/ethnicity, poverty, and age and obtained county-level information on whether an area was Urban, Suburban, or Rural. Finally, we used negative binomial generalized linear models, adapted for residual spatial dependence, to determine the association between per capita tobacco retailer density and demographic characteristics-summarized by adjusted rate ratios.
There were more (from 1.4-1.9 times as many) retailers per capita in high-poverty, vs. low-poverty tracts. Poverty also interacted with age: the association between high poverty and high retailer density was stronger for tracts with a low youth population. Density was also greater in tracts with a high (vs. low) prevalence of African Americans (1.1 times as many) and Hispanics (1.2 times as many). Finally, density was generally greater in rural (vs. suburban or urban) tracts, although the effect was modified by a three-way interaction: density was particularly high for rural tracts that also had both a high prevalence of poverty and a low youth population.
Overall, our findings indicate that Ohio's vulnerable populations are exposed to a greater per capita density of tobacco retailers.
There is a need for state and local-level tobacco control policies that will improve equity and reduce health disparities.
来自美国各地的研究表明,烟草零售商(便利店、烟草店等)分布不均加剧了与烟草相关的健康差异。本研究的目的是使用先进的计数数据空间建模技术来估计俄亥俄州目前烟草零售商密度的差异。
我们识别并对俄亥俄州的11392家烟草零售商进行了地理编码。接下来,我们获取了人口普查区层面关于种族/民族、贫困和年龄的信息,并获取了县级层面关于一个地区是城市、郊区还是农村的信息。最后,我们使用适用于残差空间依赖性的负二项式广义线性模型,通过调整后的率比来确定人均烟草零售商密度与人口特征之间的关联。
高贫困地区的人均零售商数量比低贫困地区多(多1.4至1.9倍)。贫困还与年龄相互作用:在青年人口较少的地区,高贫困与高零售商密度之间的关联更强。非裔美国人(多1.1倍)和西班牙裔(多1.2倍)患病率高的地区的密度也更高。最后,农村地区(相对于郊区或城市地区)的密度通常更高,尽管这种影响因三方相互作用而有所改变:贫困率高且青年人口少的农村地区的密度特别高。
总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,俄亥俄州的弱势群体面临着更高的人均烟草零售商密度。
需要州和地方层面的烟草控制政策来改善公平性并减少健康差异。