文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

评估中国黄河流域燃煤电厂碳捕集与封存-增强风化技术的潜力、成本和环境效益。

Assessment of potential, cost, and environmental benefits of CCS-EWR technology for coal-fired power plants in Yellow River Basin of China.

机构信息

Center for Sustainable Development and Energy Policy Research (SDEP), School of Energy & Mining Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing (CUMTB), Beijing, 100083, China.

The Administrative Center for China's Agenda 21, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing, 100038, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2021 Aug 15;292:112717. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112717. Epub 2021 May 17.


DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112717
PMID:34015611
Abstract

As an effective emission reduction approach, CO capture and storage (CCS) combined with enhanced water recovery (EWR) technology can not only reduce CO emissions, but can also recover deep saline water resources to relieve pressure on regional water resources, and can ensure the energy supply and both social and economic development. However, the environmental benefits and application costs of CCS-EWR are uncertain, and are determined by the technology level, geological conditions, and other physical factors. In this study, an optimal source-sink matching model and a techno-economic assessment model were developed to evaluate the contributions of CCS-EWR to carbon emission reduction and the increase of the water supply by considering various uncertain factors, as well as the corresponding costs. In addition, the Yellow River Basin (YRB) in China was selected as the research region because, while there are abundant coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) in the YRB, the water resources are scarce. The results revealed the following. (1) The maximum CO capture capacity of the 236 CFPPs in the YRB is about 738.77 Mt/a, and nearly 13.14 Gt of fresh water could be provided until the 236 CFPPs in the YRB retire, which can partially relieve the pressure on the supply of water resources. (2) With the consideration of the CCS-EWR benefits, the average cost of the 236 CFPPs in the YRB in their residual lifetime to reduce their CO emissions by 90% will be no more than 180 CNY/t. (3) The incentive effect of the increase of the industrial water price on the profits of CCS-EWR projects is not significant. CCS-EWR technology has better application prospects in China under the dual constraints of carbon-neutral targets and water shortages, and more policy support is required for its deployment.

摘要

作为一种有效的减排方法,CO2 捕集与封存(CCS)与强化采水(EWR)技术相结合,不仅可以减少 CO2 排放,还可以回收深部咸水资源,缓解区域水资源压力,保障能源供应和社会经济发展。然而,CCS- EWR 的环境效益和应用成本不确定,取决于技术水平、地质条件等物理因素。本研究构建了一个源汇匹配模型和一个技术经济评估模型,综合考虑各种不确定性因素和相应成本,评估了 CCS- EWR 对碳减排和供水增加的贡献。此外,选择中国黄河流域(YRB)作为研究区域,因为该地区虽然有丰富的燃煤电厂(CFPPs),但水资源匮乏。结果表明:(1)YRB 内 236 座 CFPPs 的最大 CO2 捕集能力约为 738.77 Mt/a,在 236 座 CFPPs 退役前,可提供近 13.14 Gt 的淡水,可部分缓解水资源供应压力。(2)考虑到 CCS- EWR 的效益,YRB 内 236 座 CFPPs 在剩余寿命内减排 90% CO2 的平均成本不超过 180 CNY/t。(3)工业水价上涨对 CCS- EWR 项目利润的激励作用并不显著。CCS- EWR 技术在中国碳中性目标和水资源短缺的双重约束下具有较好的应用前景,需要更多的政策支持来部署该技术。

相似文献

[1]
Assessment of potential, cost, and environmental benefits of CCS-EWR technology for coal-fired power plants in Yellow River Basin of China.

J Environ Manage. 2021-8-15

[2]
Decarbonizing the Coal-Fired Power Sector in China via Carbon Capture, Geological Utilization, and Storage Technology.

Environ Sci Technol. 2021-10-5

[3]
Impacts of carbon markets and subsidies on carbon capture and storage retrofitting of existing coal-fired units in China.

J Environ Manage. 2023-1-15

[4]
Mapping the economy of coal power plants retrofitted with post-combustion and biomass co-firing carbon capture in China.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023-4

[5]
Data on potential of CO capture and enhanced water recovery projects in modern coal chemical industries in China.

Data Brief. 2019-3-2

[6]
The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011-5-9

[7]
The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan.

Environ Sci Technol. 2017-1-10

[8]
Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003-6

[9]
[Assessment of Emission Reduction Potential of CO Capture, Geological Utilization, and Storage in Cement Industry of China].

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023-12-8

[10]
[Carbon capture and storage (CCS) and its potential role to mitigate carbon emission in China].

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2007-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
Review of Policy Framework for the Development of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage in China.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-12-15

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索