Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Science. 2021 Aug 13;373(6556):818-823. doi: 10.1126/science.abh1139. Epub 2021 May 20.
Neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) elicited against the receptor binding site (RBS) of the spike protein of wild-type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are generally less effective against recent variants of concern. RBS residues Glu, Lys, and Asn are mutated in variants first described in South Africa (B.1.351) and Brazil (P.1). We analyzed their effects on angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 binding, as well as the effects of two of these mutations (K417N and E484K) on nAbs isolated from COVID-19 patients. Binding and neutralization of the two most frequently elicited antibody families (IGHV3-53/3-66 and IGHV1-2), which can both bind the RBS in alternative binding modes, are abrogated by K417N, E484K, or both. These effects can be structurally explained by their extensive interactions with RBS nAbs. However, nAbs to the more conserved, cross-neutralizing CR3022 and S309 sites were largely unaffected. The results have implications for next-generation vaccines and antibody therapies.
中和抗体(nAbs)针对野生型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)刺突蛋白的受体结合位点(RBS)产生,通常对最近令人关注的变异体的效果较差。RBS 残基 Glu、Lys 和 Asn 在南非(B.1.351)和巴西(P.1)首次描述的变体中发生突变。我们分析了它们对血管紧张素转换酶 2 结合的影响,以及这两个突变(K417N 和 E484K)对从 COVID-19 患者中分离出的 nAbs 的影响。两种最常被激发的抗体家族(IGHV3-53/3-66 和 IGHV1-2)的结合和中和作用被 K417N、E484K 或两者均阻断,这两种抗体家族都可以以替代结合模式结合 RBS。这些效应可以通过它们与 RBS nAbs 的广泛相互作用在结构上得到解释。然而,对更保守的、交叉中和的 CR3022 和 S309 位点的 nAbs 影响不大。研究结果对下一代疫苗和抗体疗法具有重要意义。