Suppr超能文献

信息疫情:与死亡相关的想法对新闻分享的影响。

Infodemic: the effect of death-related thoughts on news-sharing.

机构信息

Murdoch Singapore, Murdoch University Singapore, Kings Centre #03-01, 390 Havelock Road, Singapore, 169662, Singapore.

School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, Level 4, Singapore, 178903, Singapore.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 May 20;6(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00306-0.

Abstract

Research on the sharing of fake news has primarily focused on the manner in which fake news spreads and the literary style of fake news. These studies, however, do not explain how characteristics of fake news could affect people's inclination toward sharing these news articles. Drawing on the Terror Management Theory, we proposed that fake news is more likely to elicit death-related thoughts than real news. Consequently, to manage the existential anxiety that had been produced, people share the news articles to feel connected to close others as a way of resolving the existential anxiety. Across three experimental studies (total N = 416), we found that it was not news type per se (i.e., real versus fake news) that influenced news-sharing intentions; instead, it was the increased accessibility to death-related thoughts elicited from the content of news articles that motivated news-sharing. The findings support the Terror Management framework and contribute to the existing literature by providing an empirical examination of the underlying psychological motive behind fake news-sharing tendencies.

摘要

有关虚假新闻共享的研究主要集中在虚假新闻传播的方式和虚假新闻的文体上。然而,这些研究并不能解释虚假新闻的特征如何影响人们分享这些新闻文章的倾向。本研究借鉴了死亡管理理论,提出虚假新闻比真实新闻更能引发与死亡相关的想法。因此,为了应对由此产生的存在性焦虑,人们分享新闻文章,与亲近的人建立联系,以此来缓解这种存在性焦虑。通过三项实验研究(总 N=416),我们发现,影响新闻分享意愿的不是新闻类型本身(即真实新闻与虚假新闻),而是新闻内容引发的与死亡相关的想法的可及性。这些发现支持了死亡管理框架,并通过对虚假新闻分享倾向背后的潜在心理动机的实证检验,为现有文献做出了贡献。

相似文献

1
Infodemic: the effect of death-related thoughts on news-sharing.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 May 20;6(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00306-0.
2
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
3
A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):78-98. doi: 10.1177/1745691620986135. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
4
Conscientiousness does not moderate the association between political ideology and susceptibility to fake news sharing.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Nov;152(11):3277-3284. doi: 10.1037/xge0001467. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
5
How Can Psychological Science Help Counter the Spread of Fake News?
Span J Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;24:e25. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2021.23.
6
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Oct 7;5(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3.
9
Social media affordances and information abundance: Enabling fake news sharing during the COVID-19 health crisis.
Health Informatics J. 2021 Jul-Sep;27(3):14604582211021470. doi: 10.1177/14604582211021470.
10
The relationship between political affiliation and beliefs about sources of "fake news".
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Feb 12;6(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00278-1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Terror Management Theory and the COVID-19 Pandemic.
J Humanist Psychol. 2021 Mar;61(2):173-189. doi: 10.1177/0022167820959488.
3
Internet Searches for Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in the United States.
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1116-1118. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1764.
4
A New Application of Social Impact in Social Media for Overcoming Fake News in Health.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 3;17(7):2430. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072430.
5
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
6
Anatomy of an online misinformation network.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 27;13(4):e0196087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196087. eCollection 2018.
7
The spread of true and false news online.
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
8
The science of fake news.
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
9
They Came, They Liked, They Commented: Social Influence on Facebook News Channels.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Aug;18(8):431-6. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0005.
10
Is the igeneration a 'we' generation? Social networking use among 9- to 13-year-olds and belonging.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;31(Pt 1):136-42. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12007. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验