• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价一项在澳大利亚社区牙科机构中推广微创牙科(MID)的干预措施:一项试点研究。

Evaluation of an intervention to promote minimally invasive dentistry (MID) in an Australian community dental agency-A pilot study.

机构信息

Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Vic., Australia.

Community Dental Program, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Vic., Australia.

出版信息

Int J Dent Hyg. 2022 Nov;20(4):627-634. doi: 10.1111/idh.12523. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1111/idh.12523
PMID:34018672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9788196/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of an intervention consisting of a 1-day continuing professional development (CPD) education programme on the International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS ), and monthly performance feedback, and to promote minimally invasive dentistry (MID) for children aged under 12 years in an Australian community dental agency. The a priori hypotheses assumed the intervention would increase preventive services, and treatment demand was met.

METHODS

A quasi non-randomized controlled trial with convenience sampling method was adopted. Fourteen dental practitioners received the intervention. The prevalence of dental caries and gingivitis in Australian children was used to determine the treatment demand and used as the performance benchmark. Ten types of preventive and non-preventive dental services were examined. A Difference-in-Differences (DiD) of 12-month pre- (baseline) and post-intervention analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The intervention group demonstrated increases in topical fluoride application and dietary analysis and advice services. The standard care group had increases in oral prophylaxis or scale and clean, topical fluoride application and oral hygiene instructions (p-value <0.05). The DiD analysis confirmed the above findings in the intervention group, while other preventive services declined. In the intervention group, the performance benchmark for oral prophylaxis or scale and clean and oral hygiene instructions was met at baseline and post-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a few preventive services had already met the performance benchmark. The intervention was associated with varied changes to preventive and non-preventive dental services. More robust study design addressing the study limitations and validating the performance benchmark is required.

摘要

目的

评估由为期 1 天的继续教育(CPD)教育计划、每月绩效反馈组成的干预措施对国际龋病分类和管理系统(ICCMS)的影响,并在澳大利亚社区牙科机构中推广针对 12 岁以下儿童的微创牙科(MID)。先验假设认为该干预措施将增加预防服务,并满足治疗需求。

方法

采用准非随机对照试验和便利抽样方法。14 名牙医接受了干预措施。使用澳大利亚儿童龋齿和牙龈炎的患病率来确定治疗需求,并将其作为绩效基准。检查了 10 种预防和非预防牙科服务。采用 12 个月前(基线)和后干预分析的差异(DiD)。

结果

干预组在局部氟化物应用和饮食分析及建议服务方面有所增加。对照组在口腔卫生防护或刮治和清洁、局部氟化物应用和口腔卫生指导方面有所增加(p 值<0.05)。差异分析证实了干预组的上述发现,而其他预防服务则下降。在干预组中,口腔卫生防护或刮治和清洁以及口腔卫生指导的绩效基准在基线和干预后均得到满足。

结论

只有少数预防服务已经达到了绩效基准。干预措施与预防和非预防牙科服务的各种变化有关。需要更严格的研究设计来解决研究限制并验证绩效基准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c55/9788196/f24229a9080f/IDH-20-627-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c55/9788196/f24229a9080f/IDH-20-627-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c55/9788196/f24229a9080f/IDH-20-627-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an intervention to promote minimally invasive dentistry (MID) in an Australian community dental agency-A pilot study.评价一项在澳大利亚社区牙科机构中推广微创牙科(MID)的干预措施:一项试点研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2022 Nov;20(4):627-634. doi: 10.1111/idh.12523. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
2
Caries-preventive methods used for children and adolescents in Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden.丹麦、冰岛、挪威和瑞典用于儿童及青少年的防龋方法。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;27(2):144-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02004.x.
3
Caries-preventive effectiveness of fluoride varnish as adjunct to oral health promotion and supervised tooth brushing in preschool children: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.氟化物涂漆作为学龄前儿童口腔健康促进和监督刷牙辅助手段的防龋效果:一项双盲随机对照试验
J Dent. 2014 Oct;42(10):1277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
4
The influences on preventive care provided to children who frequently attend the UK General Dental Service.对经常就诊于英国国民牙科服务机构的儿童所提供预防保健的影响。
Br Dent J. 2003 Mar 22;194(6):329-32; discussion 318. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809947.
5
Fluoride varnish or fluoride mouth rinse? A comparative study of two school-based programs.氟化物清漆还是氟化物漱口水?两项校内项目的对比研究。
Community Dent Health. 2016 Mar;33(1):23-6.
6
[Use of dental hygienists in caries prevention].[牙科保健员在龋齿预防中的应用]
Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid. 1976 Sep;86(8):340-4.
7
Screening and Interventions to Prevent Dental Caries in Children Younger Than 5 Years: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.5 岁以下儿童龋齿的筛查和干预:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2179-2192. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.15658.
8
Preferences for caries prevention agents in adult patients: findings from the dental practice-based research network.成人患者对龋齿预防剂的偏好:来自牙科实践为基础的研究网络的研究结果。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;38(4):360-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00547.x. Epub 2010 May 18.
9
A randomised controlled trial to measure the effects and costs of a dental caries prevention regime for young children attending primary care dental services: the Northern Ireland Caries Prevention In Practice (NIC-PIP) trial.一项随机对照试验,旨在衡量针对接受初级保健牙科服务的幼儿的龋齿预防方案的效果和成本:北爱尔兰龋齿预防实践(NIC-PIP)试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Sep;20(71):1-96. doi: 10.3310/hta20710.
10
Fluoride and caries prevention: a scoping review of public health policies.氟化物与龋齿预防:公共卫生政策范围综述
Ann Ig. 2024 May-Jun;36(3):270-280. doi: 10.7416/ai.2024.2593. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A narrative review of minimally invasive techniques in restorative dentistry.口腔修复学中微创技术的叙述性综述
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Feb;36(2):228-233. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.11.005. Epub 2023 Nov 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing Professionalism in Dentistry: A Systematic Review.牙科专业素养的培养:一项系统综述。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2017 May 17;6:85. doi: 10.15694/mep.2017.000085. eCollection 2017.
2
Can feedback approaches reduce unwarranted clinical variation? A systematic rapid evidence synthesis.反馈方法能否减少不必要的临床变异?系统快速证据综合。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 16;20(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4860-0.
3
Ending the neglect of global oral health: time for radical action.终结全球口腔健康忽视:采取激进行动的时候到了。
Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):261-272. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31133-X.
4
Oral diseases: a global public health challenge.口腔疾病:全球公共健康挑战。
Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):249-260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31146-8.
5
A survey of cariology teaching in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰龋病学教学调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1176-4.
6
Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.设计双重差分研究:公共卫生政策研究的最佳实践。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:453-469. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
Measuring Adherence to Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.测量对基于证据的临床实践指南的依从性。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2017 Dec;17(4):301-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 12.
8
Restorative Thresholds for Carious Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.龋损的修复阈值:系统评价与Meta分析
J Dent Res. 2017 May;96(5):501-508. doi: 10.1177/0022034517693605. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
9
Evaluating the impact of caries prevention and management by caries risk assessment guidelines on clinical practice in a dental teaching hospital.通过龋病风险评估指南评估龋病预防与管理对一所牙科教学医院临床实践的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2016 May 26;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0217-9.
10
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.乳牙龋齿的预成冠
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 31;2015(12):CD005512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3.