Suppr超能文献

利用数字设备促进早期读写能力:一项试点随机对照试验。

Promoting Early Literacy Using Digital Devices: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at Penn, Roberts Center for Pediatric Research (JP Guevara, D Erkoboni, and M Gerdes), Philadelphia, Pa.

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at Penn, Roberts Center for Pediatric Research (JP Guevara, D Erkoboni, and M Gerdes), Philadelphia, Pa.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2021 Aug;21(6):1001-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 May 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine feasibility and explore effects of literacy promotion using e-books versus board books on the home reading environment, book reading, television use, and child development.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trial comparing digital literacy promotion (DLP) using e-books to standard literacy promotion (SLP) using board books among Medicaid-eligible infants. DLP participants received e-books on home digital devices, while SLP participants received board books at well visits between 6 and 12 months of age. Differences in StimQ Read Subscale (StimQ-Read) scores, parent-reported reading and television use, and Bayley Scales of Infant Development-3rd Edition (Bayley-3) scores between groups were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 104 Medicaid-eligible infants were enrolled and randomized from 3 pediatric practices. There were no differences in sociodemographic characteristics between groups at baseline. Children in the DLP group initially had lower StimQ-Read scores but showed similar increases in StimQ-Read scores over time as children in the SLP group. Parents in the DLP group reported greater use of digital devices to read or engage their child (65% vs 23%, P < .001) but similar board book reading and television viewing. There were no differences between groups in cognitive or motor scale scores, but DLP participants had marginally lower language scales scores (DLP 85.7 vs SLP 89.7; P = .10) at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION: Literacy promotion using e-books was feasible and associated with greater e-book usage but no difference in board book reading, television viewing, or home reading environment scores. A potential adverse impact of e-books on language development should be confirmed in future study.

摘要

目的

确定使用电子书和布书进行扫盲推广对家庭阅读环境、阅读书籍、看电视和儿童发展的可行性,并探讨其效果。

方法

这是一项比较电子书数字化扫盲推广(DLP)与布书标准扫盲推广(SLP)对符合医疗补助条件的婴儿影响的随机对照试验。DLP 组参与者在家中的数字设备上阅读电子书,而 SLP 组参与者则在 6 至 12 个月大时的常规就诊中获得布书。使用意向治疗分析比较两组间 StimQ 阅读分量表(StimQ-Read)评分、父母报告的阅读和电视使用情况以及贝利婴幼儿发展量表第三版(Bayley-3)评分的差异。

结果

共纳入并随机分配了 3 个儿科诊所的 104 名符合医疗补助条件的婴儿。两组在基线时的社会人口学特征无差异。DLP 组儿童最初的 StimQ-Read 评分较低,但随着时间的推移,他们的 StimQ-Read 评分增加幅度与 SLP 组相似。DLP 组的父母报告更多地使用数字设备阅读或与孩子互动(65%比 23%,P<.001),但布书阅读和电视观看情况相似。两组间认知或运动量表评分无差异,但 DLP 组的语言量表评分略低(DLP 85.7 比 SLP 89.7;P=0.10),在 6 个月随访时。

结论/讨论:使用电子书进行扫盲推广是可行的,与更多的电子书使用相关,但与布书阅读、看电视或家庭阅读环境评分无差异。电子书对语言发展的潜在不利影响应在未来研究中得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验