Cooper Gregory S, Rich Karl M, Shankar Bhavani, Rana Vinay, Ratna Nazmun N, Kadiyala Suneetha, Alam Mohammad J, Nadagouda Sharan B
Centre for Development, Environment and Policy (CeDEP), School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), London, United Kingdom.
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), West Africa Regional Office, Dakar, Senegal.
Agric Syst. 2021 May;190:103096. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103096.
There is growing recognition that food systems must adapt to become more sustainable and equitable. Consequently, in developing country contexts, there is increasing momentum away from traditional producer-facing value chain upgrades towards efforts to increase both the availability and affordability of nutritious foods at the consumer level. However, such goals must navigate the inherent complexities of agricultural value chains, which involve multiple interactions, feedbacks and unintended consequences, including important but often surprising trade-offs between producers and consumers.
Based around the 'Loop' horticultural aggregation scheme of Digital Green in Bihar, India, we develop a system dynamics modelling framework to survey the value chain trade-offs emerging from upgrades that aim to improve the availability of fruits and vegetables in small retail-oriented markets. We model the processes of horticultural production, aggregation, marketing, and retailing - searching for futures that are 'win-win-win' for: (i) the availability of fruits and vegetables in small retail markets, (ii) the profits of farmers participating in aggregation, and (iii) the sustainability of the initial scheme for Digital Green as an organisation. We simulate two internal upgrades to aggregation and two upgrades to the wider enabling environment through a series of 5000 Monte Carlo trajectories - designed to explore the plausible future dynamics of the three outcome dimensions relative to the baseline.
We find that 'win-win-win' futures cannot be achieved by internal changes to the aggregation scheme alone, emerging under a narrow range of scenarios that boost supplies to the small retail market whilst simultaneously supporting the financial takeaways of farmers. In contrast, undesirable producer versus consumer trade-offs emerge as unintended consequences of scaling-up aggregation and the introduction of market-based cold storage.
This approach furthers ongoing efforts to capture complex value chain processes, outcomes and upgrades within system dynamics modelling frameworks, before scanning the horizon of plausible external scenarios, internal dynamics and unintended trade-offs to identify 'win-win-win' futures for all.
人们越来越认识到,粮食系统必须进行调整,以变得更具可持续性和公平性。因此,在发展中国家的背景下,正出现越来越大的势头,即从传统的面向生产者的价值链升级,转向努力在消费者层面提高营养食品的可获得性和可承受性。然而,这些目标必须应对农业价值链固有的复杂性,其中涉及多种相互作用、反馈和意外后果,包括生产者和消费者之间重要但往往令人惊讶的权衡取舍。
基于印度比哈尔邦数字绿色组织的“循环”园艺聚合计划,我们开发了一个系统动力学建模框架,以调查旨在改善小型零售市场水果和蔬菜供应的升级所产生的价值链权衡。我们对园艺生产、聚合、营销和零售过程进行建模,寻找对以下三方“三赢”的未来:(i)小型零售市场水果和蔬菜的供应;(ii)参与聚合的农民的利润;(iii)数字绿色组织作为一个机构的初始计划的可持续性。我们通过一系列5000次蒙特卡洛轨迹模拟了聚合的两项内部升级和更广泛的有利环境的两项升级,旨在探索相对于基线的三个结果维度的合理未来动态。
我们发现,仅靠聚合计划的内部变化无法实现“三赢”的未来,只有在少数情况下才会出现,即增加对小型零售市场的供应,同时支持农民的经济收益。相比之下,扩大聚合规模和引入基于市场的冷藏的意外后果是出现了不良的生产者与消费者之间的权衡。
这种方法进一步推动了正在进行的努力,即在扫描合理的外部情景、内部动态和意外权衡的视野之前,在系统动力学建模框架内捕捉复杂的价值链过程、结果和升级,以确定对所有人都“三赢”的未来。