Kluemper Andrew, Heath Lauren, Loeb Danielle, Kroehl Miranda, Trinkley Katy
Assistant Professor, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Associate Professor-Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Ment Health Clin. 2021 May 12;11(3):175-180. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2021.05.175. eCollection 2021 May.
Depression is one of the most common mental illnesses in the United States and is often treated in primary care settings. Despite its prevalence, depression remains underdiagnosed and undertreated for a variety of reasons, including stigma. This may result in suboptimal management of depression. Studies evaluating stigma in US primary care providers (PCP) are scarce. The main objective of this study was to describe stigma in a cohort of PCPs.
We utilized a validated questionnaire to measure stigma (score range 15 to 75 with lower scores indicating lower stigma levels). PCPs in 2 academic internal medicine clinics were sent an electronic questionnaire and received a small monetary incentive for responding. In addition to the stigma survey, we collected demographic data, including age, provider type, gender, and other data related to social proximity to mental illness. To describe stigma, differences in stigma between provider characteristics were evaluated using tests and ANOVA tests as appropriate.
Of 107 PCPs, 71 responded (66.4% response rate). Male responders displayed higher stigma scores than females (31.8 vs 27.4, = .0021). Medical residents displayed higher stigma scores than nonresidents (31.3 vs 27.2, = .0045). Providers with personal exposure to mental illness and those who reported they frequently treated depression had less stigma.
Overall, a range of stigma was present among PCPs surveyed. Higher levels of stigma were found in men, medical residents, those without personal exposure to mental illness, younger PCPs, and those who reported treating depression less frequently. Future studies should utilize larger sample sizes and focus on the impact of stigma on quality of care.
抑郁症是美国最常见的精神疾病之一,常在初级保健机构接受治疗。尽管其患病率很高,但由于包括污名化在内的多种原因,抑郁症仍然诊断不足且治疗不充分。这可能导致抑郁症的管理效果不佳。评估美国初级保健提供者(PCP)污名化情况的研究很少。本研究的主要目的是描述一组初级保健提供者中的污名化情况。
我们使用经过验证的问卷来测量污名化程度(得分范围为15至75,得分越低表明污名化程度越低)。向两家学术性内科诊所的初级保健提供者发送了电子问卷,并为回复者提供了少量金钱奖励。除了污名化调查外,我们还收集了人口统计学数据,包括年龄、提供者类型、性别以及与精神疾病社会亲近度相关的其他数据。为了描述污名化情况,根据情况使用检验和方差分析来评估提供者特征之间的污名化差异。
在107名初级保健提供者中,71人做出了回应(回应率为66.4%)。男性回应者的污名化得分高于女性(31.8对27.4,=0.0021)。住院医师的污名化得分高于非住院医师(31.3对27.2,=0.0045)。有过精神疾病亲身经历的提供者以及那些报告经常治疗抑郁症的提供者污名化程度较低。
总体而言,在接受调查的初级保健提供者中存在一定程度的污名化。在男性、住院医师、没有精神疾病亲身经历的人、年轻的初级保健提供者以及那些报告较少治疗抑郁症的人中发现了较高水平的污名化。未来的研究应该使用更大的样本量,并关注污名化对医疗质量的影响。