Irwin Madison N, VandenBerg Amy
Clinical Pharmacist Specialist in Psychology and Neurology, Department of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ment Health Clin. 2021 May 12;11(3):200-210. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2021.05.200. eCollection 2021 May.
MDD represents a significant burden worldwide, and while a number of approved treatments exist, there are high rates of treatment resistance and refractoriness. Ketamine, an -methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist, is a novel, rapid-acting antidepressant, however the mechanisms underlying the efficacy of ketamine are not well understood and many other mechanisms outside of NMDAR antagonism have been postulated based on preclinical data. This focused review aims to present a summary of the proposed mechanisms of action by which ketamine functions in depressive disorders supported by preclinical data and clinical studies in humans.
A literature search was completed using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Results were limited to clinical trials and case studies in humans that were published in English. The findings were used to compile this article.
The antidepressant effects associated with ketamine are mediated via a complex interplay of mechanisms; key steps include NMDAR blockade on γ-aminobutyric acid interneurons, glutamate surge, and subsequent activation and upregulation of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor.
Coadministration of ketamine for MDD with other psychotropic agents, for example benzodiazepines, may attenuate antidepressant effects. Limited evidence exists for these effects and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
重度抑郁症(MDD)在全球范围内造成了重大负担,虽然有多种已获批的治疗方法,但治疗抵抗和难治性的发生率很高。氯胺酮是一种N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体(NMDAR)拮抗剂,是一种新型速效抗抑郁药,然而氯胺酮疗效的潜在机制尚未完全明确,基于临床前数据推测,除了NMDAR拮抗作用外,还有许多其他机制。这篇重点综述旨在总结临床前数据和人体临床研究支持的氯胺酮在抑郁症中发挥作用的拟议作用机制。
使用PubMed和谷歌学术数据库完成文献检索。结果仅限于以英文发表的人体临床试验和病例研究。这些研究结果用于撰写本文。
与氯胺酮相关的抗抑郁作用是通过多种机制的复杂相互作用介导的;关键步骤包括NMDAR对γ-氨基丁酸中间神经元的阻断、谷氨酸激增以及随后α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸受体的激活和上调。
氯胺酮与其他精神药物(如苯二氮䓬类药物)联合用于治疗MDD可能会减弱抗抑郁作用。关于这些影响的证据有限,应逐案评估。