• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Impella 循环支持治疗高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Short term outcomes of Impella circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Division of Cardiology, Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 1;99(1):27-36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29757. Epub 2021 May 24.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.29757
PMID:34028964
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study is to evaluate short term safety and efficacy of Impella in high risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) population.

BACKGROUND

While several studies demonstrated the clinical significance of Impella in HR-PCI, few data exist about its impact on short term outcome.

METHODS

All studies reporting short term outcomes of PCI with any Impella device were included. The primary endpoint was either in-hospital or 30-day mortality, while vascular complications, post-procedural stroke, post-procedural dialysis and bleeding complications were assessed as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Nine studies with 7448 patients were included. Median age was 69.5 years old (67-73), with a mean ejection fraction of 29.7% (20%-39%) and a Syntax score of 30.2 (25. 5-33, interquartile [IQR]). Impella 2.5 was the most commonly used axial flow pump used to support these PCIs (88.7%). In-hospital death was observed in 5.09% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.69-6.49, I  = 78%), while vascular complications in 2.53% of patients (1.07-4.00, I  = 89%) and post-procedural stroke in 2.77% of patients (0.50-6.05, I  = 98%). Major bleeding occurred in 5.98% of patients (3.66-8.31, I  = 90%) and post-procedural dialysis in 4.44% of patients (1.50-7.37, I  = 93% all CI 93%).

CONCLUSION

Use of Impella in high risk PCI appears to have an acceptable rate of complication, especially regarding vascular complications and major bleedings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 Impella 在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(HR-PCI)人群中的短期安全性和疗效。

背景

虽然多项研究表明 Impella 在 HR-PCI 中的临床意义,但关于其对短期结局影响的数据较少。

方法

纳入所有报告使用任何 Impella 装置进行 PCI 的短期结局研究。主要终点为住院期间或 30 天死亡率,次要终点为血管并发症、术后卒中、术后透析和出血并发症。

结果

纳入 9 项研究共 7448 例患者。中位年龄为 69.5 岁(67-73 岁),平均射血分数为 29.7%(20%-39%),Syntax 评分 30.2(25.5-33,四分位距 [IQR])。最常使用的轴向血流泵为 Impella 2.5 以支持这些 PCI(88.7%)。住院期间死亡发生率为 5.09%(95%置信区间 [CI] 3.69-6.49,I ² = 78%),血管并发症发生率为 2.53%(1.07-4.00,I ² = 89%),术后卒中发生率为 2.77%(0.50-6.05,I ² = 98%)。大出血发生率为 5.98%(3.66-8.31,I ² = 90%),术后透析发生率为 4.44%(1.50-7.37,I ² = 93%,所有 CI 均为 93%)。

结论

高危 PCI 中使用 Impella 的并发症发生率似乎可以接受,尤其是血管并发症和大出血。

相似文献

1
Short term outcomes of Impella circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention a systematic review and meta-analysis.Impella 循环支持治疗高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 1;99(1):27-36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29757. Epub 2021 May 24.
2
Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and haemodynamic support with intra-aortic balloon versus Impella pump: Real-life single-centre preliminary results.接受复杂、高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并使用主动脉内球囊与Impella泵进行血流动力学支持的患者的临床结局:单中心真实世界初步结果
Kardiol Pol. 2022;80(12):1224-1231. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0203. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
3
Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.机械循环支持联合 Impella 或主动脉内球囊泵在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和/或心源性休克中的安全性和疗效:来自随机试验网络荟萃分析的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):E636-E645. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29236. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
4
Real-world supported unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention with impella device; data from the USpella registry.真实世界中使用Impella装置支持的非保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;来自USpella注册研究的数据。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):576-581. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26979. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
5
Impella support for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center experience.Impella 辅助治疗心原性休克和高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:单中心经验。
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Nov;40(11):853-861. doi: 10.1016/j.repce.2021.11.003.
6
Timing of impella placement in PCI for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An updated meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心原性休克的急性心肌梗死中 Impella 装置的置入时机:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Sep 1;362:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.05.011. Epub 2022 May 6.
7
Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization.在心原性休克或高危经皮冠状动脉血运重建中 Impella 植入的时机和结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 1;98(2):E222-E234. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29674. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
8
Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心源性休克患者使用经皮左心室辅助装置的性别差异:来自经皮心室辅助装置工作组
Indian Heart J. 2018 Jul;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
9
Six months follow-up of protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the microaxial Impella pump: results from the German Impella registry.使用微型轴流式 Impella 泵进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高危患者的 6 个月随访:来自德国 Impella 登记处的结果。
Coron Artery Dis. 2020 May;31(3):237-242. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000824.
10
Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the USpella Registry.真实世界中使用 Impella 2.5 循环支持系统进行复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:美国 Impella 注册研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov 1;80(5):717-25. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23403. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating high-risk PCI with axillary impella support: a case report.经腋动脉置入Impella支持下的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一例报告
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jul 18;87(8):5273-5276. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003550. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assistance in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Short-Term Outcomes.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的搏动性左心室辅助:短期结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 10;13(18):5357. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185357.
3
Management of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices in cath-lab and cardiac intensive care unit.
导管室和心脏重症监护病房中临时机械循环支持装置的管理
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2023 Jul 28;1(1):qyad011. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyad011. eCollection 2023 May.
4
The Use of Cardioprotective Devices and Strategies in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Procedures and Cardiac Surgery.经皮手术和心脏手术患者中心脏保护装置和策略的应用
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 11;11(8):1094. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081094.
5
Complex Coronary Interventions: Are We Reaching a Plateau?复杂冠状动脉介入治疗:我们是否已达到平台期?
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 8;12(8):1298. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081298.
6
Use of Impella device in cardiogenic shock and its clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Impella装置在心源性休克中的应用及其临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Mar 25;40:101007. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101007. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Case Report: Key Role of the Impella Device to Achieve Complete Revascularization in a Patient With Complex Multivessel Disease and Severely Depressed Left Ventricular Function.病例报告:Impella装置在一名患有复杂多支血管疾病和严重左心室功能不全患者实现完全血运重建中的关键作用。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 2;8:784912. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.784912. eCollection 2021.