Suppr超能文献

自闭症谱系障碍患者面部处理过程中的大脑活动:神经影像学研究的激活可能性估计 (ALE) 荟萃分析。

Brain activity during facial processing in autism spectrum disorder: an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

机构信息

Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;62(12):1412-1424. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13412. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Though aberrant face processing is a hallmark of autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), findings on accompanying brain activity are divergent. Therefore, we conducted an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of studies examining brain activity during face processing.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and PsycINFO using combinations of terms as 'fMRI', 'Autism Spectrum Disorder', 'Face Perception'. Eligible studies reported on DSM-diagnosed ASD individuals, compared to controls (HC), using face stimuli presented in fMRI and reporting whole-brain analysis coordinates. We compared two approaches: 'convergence of differences' (primary analysis) using study-level coordinates from ASD vs. HC contrasts, and 'differences in convergence' (secondary) pooling coordinates within each group separately, and contrasting the resultant ALE maps.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies (655 ASD and 668 HC) were included. Primary analysis identified a cluster in amygdala/parahippocampus where HC showed greater convergence of activation. Secondary analysis yielded no significant results.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that ASD dysfunction in face processing relies on structures involved in emotional processing rather than perception. We also demonstrate that the two ALE methodologies lead to divergent results.

摘要

背景

尽管面部处理异常是自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的一个标志,但伴随的大脑活动的发现却存在分歧。因此,我们对面部处理过程中大脑活动进行了功能磁共振成像(fMRI)的激活似然估计(ALE)元分析。

方法

我们使用“fMRI”、“自闭症谱系障碍”、“面部知觉”等术语的组合在 PubMed 和 PsycINFO 上进行了搜索。符合条件的研究报告了使用 fMRI 呈现的面部刺激,并报告了全脑分析坐标,对符合 DSM 诊断的 ASD 个体与对照组(HC)进行了比较。我们比较了两种方法:“差异的收敛”(主要分析),使用 ASD 与 HC 对比的研究水平坐标,以及“收敛的差异”(次要分析),分别在每个组内汇集坐标,并对比产生的 ALE 图。

结果

共纳入 35 项研究(655 名 ASD 和 668 名 HC)。主要分析确定了杏仁核/海马旁回中的一个簇,其中 HC 表现出更大的激活收敛。二次分析没有产生显著结果。

结论

结果表明,ASD 对面部处理的功能障碍依赖于涉及情绪处理而不是感知的结构。我们还表明,两种 ALE 方法导致了不同的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验