Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Brain Behav. 2021 Jul;11(7):e02126. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2126. Epub 2021 May 25.
Resting cerebral blood flow (CBF) and perfusion measures have been used to determine brain health. Studies showing variation in resting CBF with age and fitness level using different imaging approaches have produced mixed findings. We assess the degree to which resting CBF measures through transcranial Doppler (TCD) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI provide complementary information in older and younger, fit and unfit cohorts.
Thirty-five healthy volunteers (20 younger: 24 ± 7y; 15 older: 66 ± 7y) completed two experimental sessions (TCD/MRI). Aging and fitness effects within and between imaging modalities were assessed.
Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv, TCD) was lower and transit time (MRI) slower in older compared with younger participants (p < .05). The younger group had higher gray matter cerebral perfusion (MRI) than the older group, albeit not significantly (p = .13). Surprisingly, fitness effects in the younger group (decrease/increase in MCAv/transit time with fitness, respectively) opposed the older group (increase/decrease in MCAv/transit time). Whole cohort transit times correlated with MCAv (r=-0.63; p < .05), whereas tissue perfusion did not correlate with TCD measures.
TCD and MRI modalities provide complementary resting CBF measures, with similar effects across the whole cohort and between subgroups (age/fitness) if metrics are comparable (e.g., velocity [TCD] versus transit time [MRI]).
静息脑血流(CBF)和灌注测量已被用于评估大脑健康。使用不同的成像方法研究静息 CBF 随年龄和健康水平的变化产生了混合的结果。我们评估经颅多普勒(TCD)和动脉自旋标记(ASL)MRI 测量的静息 CBF 程度在老年和年轻、健康和不健康的队列中提供互补信息的程度。
35 名健康志愿者(20 名年轻:24 ± 7 岁;15 名年老:66 ± 7 岁)完成了两个实验阶段(TCD/MRI)。在成像方式内部和之间评估了衰老和健康对的影响。
与年轻参与者相比,年长参与者的大脑中动脉血流速度(MCAv,TCD)较低,且通过时间(MRI)较慢(p <.05)。年轻组的灰质脑灌注(MRI)高于年长组,但差异无统计学意义(p =.13)。令人惊讶的是,年轻组的健康效应(MCAv/通过时间分别随健康状况增加/减少)与年长组相反(MCAv/通过时间分别增加/减少)。整个队列的通过时间与 MCAv 相关(r=-0.63;p <.05),而组织灌注与 TCD 测量无关。
TCD 和 MRI 方式提供了互补的静息 CBF 测量值,如果指标可以比较(例如,速度[TCD]与通过时间[MRI]),则整个队列和亚组(年龄/健康状况)之间具有相似的影响。