• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后术后勃起功能恢复的预测术前和术后列线图。

A Predictive Preoperative and Postoperative Nomogram for Postoperative Potency Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

机构信息

Global Robotics Institute, Advent Health Celebration Health, Celebration, Florida.

Data Methods and Systems Statistical Laboratory, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

J Urol. 2021 Oct;206(4):942-951. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001895. Epub 2021 May 25.

DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000001895
PMID:34033495
Abstract

PURPOSE

Prediction of potency recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is useful for better patient counseling and postoperative treatment strategies. In this study we propose a preoperative and postoperative nomogram to predict postoperative potency recovery following RARP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients from development set (6,502) were selected to develop the nomograms, and patients in validation set (2,706) were used for validation. Cox regression models were fitted on the development cohort to predict potency recovery after RARP using as prognostic factors the covariates selected. Two nomograms were drawn using the regression coefficients of the preoperative and postoperative Cox models.

RESULTS

The discrimination ability of the preoperative model was evaluated on the development cohort using the receiver operator curves estimated at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The AUC at these time points was 0.726, 0.734, 0.754, and 0.778, respectively. The areas under the curve of the postoperative model at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months were 0.746, 0.756 and 0.777, and 0.801, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative predictive models were validated using a separate set of 2,706 patients. The AUCs of the preoperative model at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months were 0.789, 0.772, 0.768, and 0.778, respectively. The ROC curves of the postoperative model at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months with AUCs of 0.807, 0.797, 0.793 and 0.798, respectively. Along with age and preoperative sexual function, nerve-sparing technique determines the potency outcomes justifying better AUC for postoperative model vs the preoperative model.

CONCLUSIONS

The above nomograms help us to predict with good accuracy the probability of potency recovery within 3, 6, 12 and 24 months following surgery taking into consideration preoperative and postoperative factors. This is a novel tool for the care giver to predict realistic expectation of potency outcomes to the patients, while preoperative and immediate postoperative counseling.

摘要

目的

预测机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术(RARP)后的勃起功能恢复情况有助于更好地为患者提供咨询和制定术后治疗策略。本研究旨在建立术前和术后列线图,以预测 RARP 后的术后勃起功能恢复情况。

材料与方法

选择开发集(6502 例)中的患者建立列线图,验证集(2706 例)中的患者用于验证。使用 Cox 回归模型,将选择的预后因素作为协变量,对开发队列进行分析,预测 RARP 后的勃起功能恢复情况。使用术前和术后 Cox 模型的回归系数绘制两个列线图。

结果

通过在开发队列中估计 3、6、12 和 24 个月的接收者操作曲线,评估术前模型的区分能力。在这些时间点,AUC 值分别为 0.726、0.734、0.754 和 0.778。术后模型在 3、6、12 和 24 个月时的 AUC 值分别为 0.746、0.756 和 0.777、0.801。使用 2706 例独立患者对术前和术后预测模型进行验证。在 3、6、12 和 24 个月时,术前模型的 AUC 值分别为 0.789、0.772、0.768 和 0.778。术后模型在 3、6、12 和 24 个月时的 AUC 值分别为 0.807、0.797、0.793 和 0.798。年龄和术前性功能与神经保留技术共同决定了勃起功能的结局,这使得术后模型的 AUC 优于术前模型。

结论

上述列线图有助于考虑术前和术后因素,准确预测术后 3、6、12 和 24 个月内勃起功能恢复的概率。这是一种新的工具,可帮助护理人员在术前和术后咨询时,向患者预测现实的勃起功能结局预期。

相似文献

1
A Predictive Preoperative and Postoperative Nomogram for Postoperative Potency Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后术后勃起功能恢复的预测术前和术后列线图。
J Urol. 2021 Oct;206(4):942-951. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001895. Epub 2021 May 25.
2
A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.一种与保留术中筋膜范围相关的预测模型,用于预测神经保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):455-462. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0867-5. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
3
Significance of erection hardness score as a diagnostic tool to assess erectile function recovery in Japanese men after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.勃起硬度评分作为评估日本男性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能恢复的诊断工具的意义。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):221-6. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0571-2. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
4
Development of Nomograms to Predict the Recovery of Erectile Function Following Radical Prostatectomy.列线图预测前列腺癌根治术后勃起功能恢复情况。
J Sex Med. 2019 Nov;16(11):1796-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
5
Internal and External Validation of a 90-Day Percentage Erection Fullness Score Model Predicting Potency Recovery Following Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.90 天勃起充盈评分模型对机器人辅助前列腺根治术后勃起功能恢复预测的内部和外部验证。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;3(5):657-662. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.030. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
6
Recovery of Baseline Erectile Function in Men Following Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Measures.高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后男性基线勃起功能的恢复:一项使用有效测量方法的前瞻性分析
J Sex Med. 2016 Mar;13(3):435-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.005.
7
Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.根治性前列腺切除术术后功能结局的决定因素:机器人辅助与经耻骨后。
Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 May 17.
8
Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: focus on urinary continence recovery and related complications after 1000 procedures.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的全解剖重建:关注 1000 例手术后尿控恢复和相关并发症。
BJU Int. 2019 Sep;124(3):477-486. doi: 10.1111/bju.14716. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
9
Preoperative high serum total testosterone levels predict preserved postoperative sexual function in patients after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.术前高血清总睾酮水平可预测神经保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者术后性功能的保留。
Int J Urol. 2024 Sep;31(9):1038-1045. doi: 10.1111/iju.15511. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
10
Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function.基于术前勃起功能的机器人辅助前列腺根治术后阴茎康复的最佳策略。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):658-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11487.x. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding access to high-quality surgical care in Africa: a landmark achievement in telesurgery.扩大非洲获得高质量外科护理的机会:远程手术的一项里程碑式成就。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 24;19(1):124. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02292-7.
2
Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate affect the outcomes in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy?经尿道前列腺切除术是否会影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的结果?
World J Urol. 2024 Jun 22;42(1):384. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05105-y.
3
Impacts on functional and oncological outcomes of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy 10 years after the US Preventive Service Taskforce recommendations against PSA screening.
美国预防服务工作组建议停止 PSA 筛查 10 年后,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对功能和肿瘤学结果的影响。
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Jan-Feb;50(1):65-79. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0530.
4
Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:前瞻性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2617-2631. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01714-8. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
5
Erectile function, urinary continence and oncologic outcomes of neurovascular bundle sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.保留神经血管束的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌的勃起功能、尿控及肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 5;13:1161544. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1161544. eCollection 2023.
6
Simultaneous hernia repair following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is safe with low rates of mesh-related complications.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后同期疝修补术安全,网片相关并发症发生率低。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1653-1658. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01574-2. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
7
Comparison between intra- and postoperative outcomes of the da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi robotic platforms in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.达芬奇 SP 和达芬奇 Xi 机器人平台在接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者中的术中及术后结果比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1341-1347. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01563-5. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
8
Surgical gestures as a method to quantify surgical performance and predict patient outcomes.手术手势作为一种量化手术表现和预测患者预后的方法。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Dec 22;5(1):187. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00738-y.
9
Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.Hugo(TM) RAS 系统在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的应用与结果。
Int Braz J Urol. 2023 Mar-Apr;49(2):211-220. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.9902.
10
Neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: How I do it after 15.000 cases.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时神经血管束的保护:我在完成 15000 例手术后的做法。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Mar-Apr;48(2):212-219. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.99.04.