AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, 380 Celebration Place Suite # 410, Celebration, FL, 34747, USA.
University of Central Florida (UCF), Orlando, FL, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1341-1347. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01563-5. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
The new SP robot incorporates a single trocar that houses a flexible camera and three bi-articulated arms, which minimize the number of incisions needed to assess the surgical site, allowing for a less invasive procedure. To compare the postoperative pain scale and outcomes in patients with similar demographic characteristics undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with SP and Xi robots, One-hundred consecutive patients undergoing RARP with the SP robot were matched, using a propensity score (PS), with 100 patients from a cohort of 1757 who were operated on with the da Vinci Xi from June 2019 to January 2021. We described and compared the perioperative pain scores and outcomes of both groups. The SP group had less blood loss (50 cc vs. 62.5 cc, P < 0.001) and longer operative time (114 min. vs. 94 min, P < 0.001). The only period we could show a difference in postoperative pain scores was 6 h after surgery, with a small advantage for the SP (2 vs. 2.5, P < 0.001). Both groups had satisfactory postoperative continence recovery, 91% vs. 90% for the SP and Xi, respectively. The groups had a mean follow-up of 24.5 and 22 months for SP and Xi, respectively. The tumor stage and percentage of positive surgical margins were similar between groups (15% vs. 15%, P = 1). Patients undergoing RARP with the SP had longer operative times with less blood loss than the Xi. However, despite the lower number of abdominal incisions on the SP, the groups had similar intraoperative performance, and we were unable to demonstrate clinically significant differences in postoperative pain scores between the groups 6, 12, and 18 h after surgery.
新的 SP 机器人采用了单一的套管,其中内置了一个灵活的摄像头和三个双铰接臂,这最大限度地减少了评估手术部位所需的切口数量,使手术更具微创性。为了比较具有相似人口统计学特征的患者在接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)时,使用 SP 和 Xi 机器人的术后疼痛评分和结果,我们使用倾向评分(PS),将 2019 年 6 月至 2021 年 1 月期间接受达芬奇 Xi 手术的 1757 例患者中的 100 例与接受 SP 机器人手术的 100 例连续患者进行了匹配。我们描述并比较了两组的围手术期疼痛评分和结果。SP 组失血量更少(50cc 比 62.5cc,P<0.001),手术时间更长(114 分钟比 94 分钟,P<0.001)。我们唯一能显示术后疼痛评分差异的时期是手术后 6 小时,SP 组有轻微优势(2 比 2.5,P<0.001)。两组患者术后控便功能均恢复满意,SP 组为 91%,Xi 组为 90%。两组的平均随访时间分别为 SP 组和 Xi 组的 24.5 个月和 22 个月。两组肿瘤分期和阳性切缘百分比相似(15%比 15%,P=1)。与 Xi 组相比,接受 SP 机器人手术的患者手术时间更长,失血量更少。然而,尽管 SP 组的腹部切口数量较少,但两组的术中表现相似,我们无法证明术后 6、12 和 18 小时两组之间的术后疼痛评分存在临床显著差异。