AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, 380 Celebration Place, Orlando, FL, 34747, USA.
University of Central Florida (UCF), Orlando, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1653-1658. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01574-2. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the gold-standard treatment for localized prostate cancer in the USA. However, performing RARP along with a concomitant hernia repair with mesh is debatable because of the lack of well-designed studies on this subject. Some argue that this procedure may result in mesh infections and increased complications due to possible contact of mesh and urine. This study reports our experience with simultaneous hernia repair with mesh placement in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. We compared 244 patients (from August 2008 to August 2021) who underwent RARP with concomitant hernia repair (inguinal, umbilical, and ventral) and mesh placement with 244 patients from 6275 RARPs operated on the same period without hernia repair. We performed a propensity score matching analysis using preoperative covariates and compared the perioperative outcomes, and complications in 90 days after surgery. Median follow-up was 36.6 months for the control and hernia groups respectively (p = 0.81). Eighty-three patients had unilateral inguinal hernia repair, 22 had a bilateral inguinal hernia repair, 95 had a ventral hernia repair, and 44 had an umbilical hernia repair. The median operative time was 112 min for the control group and 160 min for hernia groups (p < 0.001). We did not find statistically significant differences in minor complications (Clavien ≤ 2). Although the postoperative readmissions in 90-days were higher in the hernia group (18 vs. 7, p = 0.038), none was associated with mesh complications. Limitation includes the retrospective design of the study. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with simultaneous hernia repair and mesh placement is safe and does not increase complications related to the mesh. In our experience, hernia repair increases the operative time, usually due to initial peritoneal flap dissection and final suturing. Therefore, we believe that hernia repair with mesh during RARP is safe and spares patients the additional impacts of an additional surgical procedure.
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术 (RARP) 是美国局限性前列腺癌的金标准治疗方法。然而,由于缺乏关于这一主题的精心设计的研究,同时进行 RARP 和网片修补术存在争议。一些人认为,由于网片和尿液可能接触,这种手术可能导致网片感染和并发症增加。本研究报告了我们在接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者中同时进行网片修补术的经验。我们比较了 244 例 (2008 年 8 月至 2021 年 8 月) 同时行 RARP 和网片修补术 (腹股沟、脐部和前腹壁) 的患者与同期未行疝修补术的 6275 例 RARP 患者的围手术期结果和术后 90 天内的并发症。我们使用术前协变量进行倾向评分匹配分析,并比较了两组患者的围手术期结果和术后 90 天内的并发症。对照组和疝组的中位随访时间分别为 36.6 个月和 36.6 个月 (p = 0.81)。83 例患者行单侧腹股沟疝修补术,22 例患者行双侧腹股沟疝修补术,95 例患者行前腹壁疝修补术,44 例患者行脐疝修补术。对照组的中位手术时间为 112 分钟,疝组为 160 分钟 (p < 0.001)。我们没有发现两组患者在轻微并发症 (Clavien ≤ 2) 方面有统计学上的显著差异。虽然疝组术后 90 天内再入院率较高 (18 例 vs. 7 例,p = 0.038),但无一例与网片并发症相关。研究的局限性包括回顾性设计。机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术同期行疝修补术和网片修补术是安全的,不会增加与网片相关的并发症。根据我们的经验,疝修补术会增加手术时间,通常是由于初始腹膜瓣切开和最终缝合。因此,我们认为在 RARP 中同时进行疝修补术和网片修补术是安全的,可以避免患者接受额外手术的影响。